Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-30
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Categories of library users
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The chart and table illustrates a combined result of a survey which conducted among a number of users at a specific university. The pie charts shows the categories of library users while the table represents the user satisfation level.
The full-time undergraduate students are highest in numbers than any other type of users. According to satisfactory level, almost every user is happy for the helpful approach of the library staffs.
Regarding the category of users, around 44% students are full-time undergraduate students. The lowest proportion, 7% accounts for academic staff. Distance learning, including all courses is holding the second lowest area of the pie chart with 8%. Full-time postgraduates comprise 25% and part-time postgraduates constitute 16%
Turning to the table, 95% users are very satisfied with the helpfulness of staff, which is the highest in percentage. In contrast, 20% users are not satisfied for the availability of journals which is the highest level of dissatisfaction. About the library opening hours, availability of the books and reliability of wifi accounts for moderate level of satisfaction.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You identify the main user group accurately: full-time undergraduates make up 44%, while academic staff are the smallest group at 7%. You also select two important satisfaction results, noting that staff helpfulness has the highest very-satisfied figure (95%) and journal availability has the highest dissatisfaction (20%). However, the overview is limited and some comparisons are not fully developed. The statement that opening hours, books and Wi-Fi show a “moderate level of satisfaction” is vague: opening hours actually receive 65% very satisfied and no dissatisfaction, while books and Wi-Fi have different profiles. Include a clearer overall summary of the strongest and weakest satisfaction results, and report more precise comparisons across the remaining categories.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a coherent overall arrangement: it introduces the visuals, discusses user categories, and then turns to satisfaction results. Paragraphing and signposting such as “Regarding the category of users” and “Turning to the table” help the reader follow the shift in focus. The progression is generally clear, though the second paragraph repeats the point that undergraduates are the largest group before the figures are detailed in the next paragraph. Some links between ideas are also mechanical, and the final paragraph groups three distinct satisfaction measures without explaining their differences. To strengthen the flow, avoid repeating the overview and organise the table details around clear comparisons, such as the highest satisfaction and the areas with more mixed responses.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “comprise,” “constitute,” and “dissatisfaction,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts to vary expressions for percentages and categories. However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “satisfactory level,” “happy for the helpful approach,” and “lowest area of the pie chart.” “User satisfaction” and “share/proportion” would be more natural in this context. There is also a spelling error in “satisfation,” and “wifi” would be better written as “Wi-Fi.” Aim for precise, conventional language for describing survey results rather than less natural paraphrases.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, and most of the information remains understandable. Some grammatical errors are present, however. In the opening, “The chart and table illustrates” has a subject–verb agreement error, and “a survey which conducted” is missing the auxiliary “was.” The sentence “The pie charts shows” also has agreement trouble and incorrectly refers to a single pie chart as plural. Other examples include “students are highest in numbers than” and “20% users,” where the comparison structure and article use need correction. Check agreement with compound subjects and plural nouns, and use complete passive forms when describing how a survey was conducted. These errors do not generally prevent the reader from understanding your points.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
