Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-03
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Categories of library users
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The pie chart and table demonstrate the outcomes of a survey related to library consumer at university. Overall, the pie chart illustrate the categories of lib
It is quite evident from the chart that full time undergraduate and postgraduate students are the highest proportion of library user which account for 44% and 25% of the total. However, the third largest user of the library are part-time postgraduate students which are 16% in total. Nevertheless, the distance learner and academic staff contribute lowest to the total library user which are 8% and 7%.
Meanwhile, the table demonstrate the level of satisfaction of the library users. The user greatly satisfied with the service of the staff and their helpfulness which are 95 out of 100 and 0 with not satisfied. Similarly, library opening hours satisfied 65 students with 35 not satisfied with opening hours. However, the books availability at the library satisfied only 50 students and nearly half are fairly satisfied with 10 not satisfied with book availability. subsequently, journals availability at library satisfied only 45 pupils and 20 were not satisfied which are the highest number of unsatisfied number among all the catogory.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You identify the main user groups accurately, including the dominance of full-time undergraduates (44%) and the relatively small shares of academic staff (7%) and distance learners (8%). You also report several satisfaction figures and note that staff helpfulness receives the strongest rating. However, the overview is incomplete: it begins “Overall” but is cut off, and there is no clear summary comparing the main satisfaction patterns. Some details are misinterpreted: 35% were fairly satisfied with opening hours, not dissatisfied, and the book figures are 50% very satisfied, 40% fairly satisfied and 10% not satisfied—not “nearly half” fairly satisfied. Reliability of wi-fi is omitted. A clearer overview and more precise reporting would make the response more complete and better supported.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a generally understandable structure: it first discusses the user categories and then turns to satisfaction, with separate paragraphs for these two visuals. Linking expressions such as “Meanwhile,” “Similarly” and “However” help signal relationships between points. However, progression within the table paragraph is less controlled: the comparisons are presented as a sequence of individual details, without a clear grouping of the strongest and weakest satisfaction results. Some connectors do not accurately express the relationship between the figures, and the unfinished opening overview (“Overall, the pie chart illustrate the categories of lib”) disrupts the flow. Organise the table information around key contrasts and use transitions only when their meaning fits the comparison.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “level of satisfaction,” “helpfulness” and “availability.” These choices make the topic clear, but several word-choice and collocation problems reduce precision. “Library consumer” is not a natural description of the people surveyed; “library users” is appropriate. Phrases such as “satisfied with the service of the staff” and “journals availability” are awkward, while “pupils” is unsuitable for university users. There are also spelling errors, including “catogory,” and repetition of “satisfied” and “library.” Aim for accurate collocations and vary wording carefully, for example by using “respondents” or “users” where appropriate.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “which” and contrastive structures with “However” and “Nevertheless.” The main information is usually understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. Subject–verb agreement is inaccurate in “the pie chart illustrate” and “the table demonstrate”; singular subjects require “illustrates” and “demonstrates.” There are also problems with articles and number, as in “the highest proportion of library user,” and with sentence construction in “The user greatly satisfied with the service,” which needs a verb such as “were.” The opening overview is incomplete, and punctuation and sentence boundaries need checking. More consistent control of agreement and complete clauses would improve accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
