Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-03
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Categories of library users
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The given bar chart illustrates the categories of library users which are present in library while the table depicts the satisfaction of users the comparisons of both are as follows.
Firstly, the bar chart represents 5 categories of person are available in libaray.
The highest ratio in library are undergraduate students which is about 44% and largest amoung others after that postgraduate students comes approxiametely 25%. The least percentage in chart are academic staffs. On the other hand all courses percentage is also small about 8%.
and the last one part time postgraduate students ratio is about 16%.
The table divided users into 3 categories very satisfied, fairly satisfied and not satisfied and 5 factors on which they give remarks.
Begining with satisfied about 65% members satisfied with library hours other 35% are more fairly satisfied while no person have issue regarding opening hours of library. In contrase with staff helpfulness out of hundred 95% satisfied and only 5 percent fairly satisfy.
on other hand books availailabilty 50% more satisfy while 40 % fairly and not satisfaction ratio is 10%. About 45% users very satisfy related to journals and 35% fairly while 20% not satisfy ratio. Last one wifi reliability about 48% very statisfied while 33% fairly and 19% not agreed with this.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You identify both visuals and report several key figures accurately, including the 44% share of full-time undergraduates, the 25% share of full-time postgraduates, and the satisfaction results for staff helpfulness and opening hours. However, the response does not give a clear overview of the main patterns across the two visuals. For example, it could highlight that undergraduates form by far the largest user group, while staff helpfulness receives the strongest satisfaction rating and journals the highest dissatisfaction. Some descriptions are also unclear: “all courses percentage” does not clearly identify distance learners, and “no person have issue” is less precise than stating that nobody was dissatisfied. A concise overview and clearer comparisons would make the summary more complete and focused.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response follows a generally sensible order: it describes the user categories first and then moves to the satisfaction table. This helps the reader distinguish the two sets of information, and phrases such as “On the other hand” and “About” attempt to connect points. However, progression within the paragraphs is uneven. The user categories are presented in a scattered order, with the 8% and 16% groups introduced after an awkward sentence beginning “and the last one.” In the table section, “on other hand” is repeated and does not always express a clear contrast. Paragraphing and linking are limited, so the response can feel like a list of figures rather than a connected summary. Grouping related results and using more precise transitions would improve flow.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “categories,” “satisfaction,” “percentage,” and “reliability,” so the reader can usually identify the topic. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the meaning unclear. For instance, “all courses percentage” is not a natural way to refer to distance-learning users, while “not agreed with this” does not accurately describe dissatisfaction with wi-fi. Repeated forms such as “satisfied” and “ratio” also reduce precision. Spelling errors, including “libaray,” “availailabilty,” and “statisified,” are noticeable. Aim to use accurate terms such as “share,” “users,” and “dissatisfied,” and check spelling before finishing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response attempts both simple statements and longer comparisons, but the range of sentence structures is limited and errors occur frequently. Some sentences lack a clear grammatical structure, as in “The highest ratio in library are undergraduate students,” where the subject and verb do not agree and the comparison is awkwardly formed. Other examples include “no person have issue” and “only 5 percent fairly satisfy,” which have problems with agreement and sentence construction. Punctuation and capitalisation are also inconsistent, particularly where a new sentence begins with “and” or “on other hand.” These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding every figure, but they sometimes make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. Practise complete, controlled sentences before adding more complex comparisons.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
