Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Categories of library users

Categories of library users

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The chart and table illustrates the categories and satisfaction the result of a survey of library users at a university.

Overall, categries of library users in the academic staff lowers and library user satisfaction in the library opening hours the not satisfied.offer sides distance learning and academic staff showed comparatively small changes by comparison. full time undergraduate highest .

Categories of library users in the full time undergraduate for the largest share of users at 44%, followed by part time postgraduate at 16% and full time postgraduate at 25%.academic staff made up a smaller proportion at 7%,other side distance learning in the at 8%.

Library opening hours was categories of library user was very satisfied in 65 person user not satisfied o user. then availability of books was categories of user very satisfied in 50 user whenever fairly satisfied in user 40 person the smaller difficult both very and fairly satisfied. not satisfied a clear decrease all categroise. then reliablity of wi-fi was students in very satisfied in 48 user and not satisfied user 19 . very satisfied all categories mostly highest of the students and person .

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.5
Coherence and Cohesion4.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall4.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify the largest user group, full-time undergraduates (44%), and include several other category figures, so some relevant information is selected. However, the overview is unclear and does not summarise the main satisfaction pattern. The table is only partly covered: you discuss opening hours, books and Wi-Fi, but omit helpfulness of staff and journals, including the notably high 95% very-satisfied result for staff and the highest dissatisfaction figure, 20% for journals. Some statements are inaccurate or difficult to interpret, such as saying the categories showed “small changes” and that opening hours had “not satisfied” users, when the figure is 0%. Select the key contrasts and report them accurately and clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is an attempt to organise the response into an introduction, an overview and separate discussion of the two visuals. This gives the reader a basic framework, and phrases such as “followed by” help show ranking. However, progression is difficult to follow because the overview contains unclear fragments, and the table discussion moves between satisfaction levels without a consistent comparison. For example, “then availability of books” is followed by an incomplete explanation, while “not satisfied a clear decrease all categories” does not make the relationship clear. Use one paragraph for user categories and another for satisfaction, grouping the strongest and weakest results, and connect complete comparisons with clear referencing.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant terms, including “largest share,” “proportion,” “followed by,” and “very satisfied,” which help convey basic comparisons. However, vocabulary is limited and repeated, and several word choices or collocations make the meaning hard to understand: “the not satisfied,” “small changes” for category proportions, and “the smaller difficult both very and fairly satisfied.” Spelling errors such as “categries,” “reliablity,” and “categroise” also reduce clarity. Build a more precise set of expressions for describing proportions and survey responses, and check spelling carefully. For example, distinguish “accounted for” when describing user groups from “were satisfied” when reporting survey ratings.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts a few comparative structures, such as “followed by part time postgraduate,” but most sentences are difficult to parse because of frequent problems with sentence formation and basic grammar. The opening, “The chart and table illustrates the categories and satisfaction the result,” has faulty agreement and an incomplete relationship between ideas. Other examples include “Library opening hours was” and “full time undergraduate highest,” where verb forms or sentence elements are missing. Punctuation and spacing are also inconsistent, with several sentences joined or left as fragments. Practise writing complete subject–verb–object sentences first, then add comparisons using accurate clauses, such as “Undergraduates made up the largest group, at 44%.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.