Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people argue that primary schools focus too much on formal learning.

To what extent do you agree with this opinion?

How important do you think it is for children to play as well as learn in the primary school classroom?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Nowadays, primary schools focus more on planned base education were the education is taught in stepwise manner to fulfill every goals of the students. I completely agree with this statement. While critics argued that too much priority on formal learning maybe not that much beneficial as informal learning. However, my viewpoint is discuss further.

Some advantages are, the education institutes are focusing more on structural learning than their alternative methods because formal learning techniques allow student to plan a proper structure for their learning and to start by doing few basic steps. Moreover, proper planning help students to study in an appropriate way and by studying in a good atmosphere they will automatically build a good recognizing system. For example, by making notes for what to do, by highlighting bulletpoints, by using searching engines , by using applications particularly based on AI. Furthermore, the crucial thing is the formal studies have been taught by an expert so he can easily classify the student wants and slove their difficulties in a easy way.

Some critics believe that, the students must be teached in a informal way were unstructured studies have been taught and they only learn everyday activities only which is not sufficient for today. Nowadays, to live in a country the education centre mainly have to provide enough knowledge related to future circumstances also so if any problem arise they can face it easily. For instance, by avoiding baisc works, self-directed studies , learning without authorise goals and studying without necessary aims.

In conclusion, the students those who are 4-11 years age groups have been taught the essential things related to their studies in a organise manner to avoid future risks.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses all parts of the two-part prompt by stating a clear position on formal learning in primary schools and discussing both aspects, though the development of ideas is somewhat superficial and repetitive. The writer states, 'I completely agree with this statement,' and attempts to provide reasons regarding structured learning, yet the support tends to drift into vague assertions rather than well-extended examples. For instance, the mention of 'searching engines' and 'applications particularly based on AI' is introduced without explaining how these relate directly to the balance between play and formal learning. Furthermore, the second body paragraph discusses counter-arguments and informal learning in a slightly confusing manner. Overall, the task is addressed, but ideas lack the depth and extension required for a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates some organisation with basic paragraphing and signposting phrases such as 'Moreover,' 'Furthermore,' and 'In conclusion.' However, the logical progression is frequently disrupted by awkward transitions, sentence fragments, and unclear referencing. For example, the sentence 'However, my viewpoint is discuss further' is ungrammatical and fails to link smoothly to the preceding text. Cohesive devices are at times misused or mechanical, and the overall flow is hindered by abrupt shifts in topic between paragraphs. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion within the paragraphs is weak, making it difficult for the reader to follow the train of thought effortlessly.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is generally basic and repetitive, with several noticeable errors in word choice and word formation that impede clear communication. Examples include 'planned base education' instead of 'activity-based' or 'formal education,' 'stepwise manner,' and 'authorise goals.' There are also spelling errors such as 'slove' and 'baisc.' While the student attempts some less common terms like 'circumstances' and 'self-directed studies,' inaccurate collocations and frequent lexical slips restrict the range and precision. The vocabulary is minimally adequate to convey a basic argument, placing it firmly at band 5.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The essay displays a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on simple and faulty complex sentences. There are frequent, heavy grammatical errors that consistently cause difficulty for the reader and distort meaning. Examples include 'were the education is taught in stepwise manner to fulfill every goals,' 'critics argued that... maybe not that much beneficial,' and 'the students must be teached in a informal way were unstructured studies have been taught.' Subject-verb agreement errors, incorrect verb forms ('teached'), and persistent punctuation and tense inconsistencies are evident throughout. Complex structures are attempted but are almost always grammatically flawed.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.