Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The younger sister of one of your friends is thinking about spending a year studying abroad as part of her university course. You did this recently, and she has asked you about your experience.

Write a letter to your friend's sister. In your letter

• tell her where you studied during your year abroad

• describe what you learnt about the country you studied in

• explain why your year abroad was helpful for your studies

Begin your letter as follows:
Dear........,

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Dear June,

How're you? I hope you're fit as a fiddle. I am happy to know that you decided to go abroad university to spend a year on study. Actually, I studied at same institution for my course so, I am writing in order to give you some advices, which would be helpful to you.

Firstly, I attended the Calgary University, which is situated in the heart of city. This university is quite renowded in Canada due to its staff, which is well qualified and helpful. Also, public transit is easily avliable to commute.

Nevertheless lefting our house is difficult, studing abroad helps to understand diverse cultures.In my class, scholars from different countries was enrolled, which hepl me to understand diverse cultures, their values and rituals.

Furthermore, studing abroad not only give us theorical but also practical knowledge, as teaching in these countries are more based on hand on learning, which make concept eassy to understand; moreover, it aslo open the door for variety of job opportunities.If you need any further assistance don't hessistate to contact me.

Best of lusk, and keep in touch

Raman

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response successfully addresses all parts of the prompt by telling the reader where you studied, describing what you learned about the country, and explaining why it was helpful for your studies. For instance, you clearly state that you attended Calgary University and explain how exposure to diverse cultures helped you understand different values and rituals. However, some ideas are more fully developed than others. While the mention of practical knowledge and job opportunities is relevant, it remains somewhat general and lacks further extension to reach a higher level of thoroughness. The tone is appropriately informal and friendly throughout, matching the requirements of a letter to a friend's sister.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The letter presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear sequence of ideas, moving logically from the initial greeting and purpose of the letter to specific details about the university, cultural learning, and academic benefits. Paragraphing is used to separate different points, and basic cohesive devices such as 'Firstly', 'Nevertheless', and 'Furthermore' are employed to guide the reader. However, cohesion can sometimes feel a bit mechanical or repetitive in its transitions, and referencing is occasionally affected by minor mechanical slips, indicating that while the organisation is clear overall, more flexible and subtle cohesive links are needed to achieve top-tier progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, successfully communicating your personal experiences and recommendations. You attempt less common lexical items, such as 'fit as a fiddle', 'diverse cultures', and 'practical knowledge'. Nevertheless, there are noticeable spelling and word choice errors throughout the text, including 'renowded' instead of renowned, 'avliable' instead of available, 'lefting' instead of leaving, 'studing' instead of studying, 'theorical' instead of theoretical, 'hand on' instead of hands-on, 'eassy' instead of easy, 'aslo' also, 'hessistate' hesitate, and 'lusk' luck. These errors occasionally distract the reader, though communication is not severely impaired.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The writing demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating relative clauses and subordinate structures like 'which is situated in the heart of city' and 'which would be helpful to you'. There is a reasonable attempt at managing different verb tenses and structures. However, there are some errors in grammar and punctuation, such as missing articles ('heart of city'), preposition issues, and subject-verb agreement mistakes like 'scholars from different countries was enrolled' instead of were enrolled, and 'teaching... are more based' instead of is more based. These errors occur across the text, reflecting a control level that allows meaning to be understood while pointing to the need for greater grammatical accuracy in complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.