Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The younger sister of one of your friends is thinking about spending a year studying abroad as part of her university course. You did this recently, and she has asked you about your experience.

Write a letter to your friend's sister. In your letter

• tell her where you studied during your year abroad

• describe what you learnt about the country you studied in

• explain why your year abroad was helpful for your studies

Begin your letter as follows:
Dear........,

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Dear Natasha,

I hope you and Emma are doing well. It has been a while since we last spoke, I wanted to tell you about my experience studying abroad in university.

In Canada, I did one-year of nursing program at Agoma university. During my stay, I learnt alot about country's culture and traditions. I also worked part-time on campus which helped me gain valuable experience and I was amazed to discover that the work culture was totally different from our country, here salary is paid on hourly basis and work insurance is mandatory.

I believe that experience of studying abroad make me more confident and bring positive changes to my personality. I have many friends from different nationalities which have helped me to understand different percepectives and languages.

Moreover, I gained practical experience and new nursing techniques. The professors were very helpful and they taught everything through practical and by doing experiments which broaden my percepective. Overall, it was a wonderful experience and I will suggest if you are getting opportunity to study abroad, you have to grab that.

I look forward to hearing from you! Take care and let me know what you think.

Best wishes,

Arsh Kaur

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address all three requested points: you identify Canada and Agoma University, describe aspects of its work culture and the international friendships you made, and explain how practical teaching and new nursing techniques supported your studies. The letter is relevant and appropriately personal. Some details, however, are less fully developed than others: the country-learning point focuses mainly on workplace arrangements, while the task asks more broadly what you learnt about the country. The study benefit is clearer, but could be linked more specifically to your university course—for example, how a particular technique or practical lesson improved your nursing knowledge. This combination of complete coverage and uneven development fits the current level; fuller, more specific explanation would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The letter has a clear overall progression: greeting and introduction, experience in Canada, benefits to your studies, and a friendly closing. Paragraphing helps distinguish the main topics, and transitions such as “Moreover” and “Overall” guide the reader through the account. Some connections are less smooth, however. The first paragraph moves from studying to part-time work and then to insurance without clearly showing how these details relate to what you learnt about Canada. The sentence beginning “I hope…” also joins two complete thoughts with only a comma, which interrupts the flow. To make the organisation more consistently effective, group related details together and use references or transitions that make the relationship between each example and the task point explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough vocabulary to communicate the experience, including relevant terms such as “part-time,” “work culture,” “practical experience,” and “nursing techniques.” There are also attempts at more specific language, such as “mandatory” and “nationalities.” However, noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision: “Agoma” may be an inaccurate name, “alot” should be written as two words, and “percepectives” and “percepective” are misspelled. Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, including “work insurance” and “grab that.” These do not prevent the reader from understanding the main message, but they limit the control and range expected at a stronger level. Check spelling carefully and choose collocations that sound natural in a personal letter.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mixture of simple and more complex sentences, including clauses with “which” and “that,” and the overall meaning remains clear. Some grammatical errors are present, particularly in verb forms, articles, agreement, and punctuation. For example, “studying abroad make me more confident” needs subject–verb agreement, while “which have helped” does not clearly agree with its reference to “many friends.” In “I did one-year of nursing program,” the article and noun phrase need correction; “I did a one-year nursing programme” would be more accurate. The opening also joins two independent clauses with a comma. These errors are generally understandable, but more consistent control of sentence boundaries and agreement, alongside varied accurate structures, would improve the writing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.