Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-12
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic:
In many countries, family members work together in their family business.
Do you think family businesses have more advantages than disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Living in joint family system is very common in many countries of the world. From living in the same house to running the business together can be observed in the said countries. Few indiviuals believe that working together is very benificial while other believes the opposite is the case.
To begin with families living in the same space have a strong bonding between them. Therefore ,they prefer to run a joint ventures which people believe is easy to handle since they dont have to hire the extra employees from the local job markets. Family members divide different post among them and hence they are responsible of their on department, they make their own choices by dicussing them within the family rather than taking any advice from an outsider. Whereas indiviuals running their business alone usually have to make difficult choices by themselves and would often feel double mined about it.
On the other hand most people consider that running a family business can create a lot of stress in their relations. For instance the family members running a joint business often talk about the scenerios and difficulties at their homes which can lead to a heated argument and can cause a serious impact on personal relations. while the indiviuals with their own business mostly have quiet and peaceful time at homes and personal gatherings which according to their perspective make their family bonding strong and less stressful.
I strongly believe that although their are many advantages in running a family business ,I also believe it has its serious disadvantage as well. Rather than expending the job markets anf giving opportunity to capable employess ,family business mostly focus on the giving top positions to only blood relations whether they are less capable or ruin the project.
Consquently i would say that despite having some benefits its detractors are more impact full in business and professional world.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both sides of the question and give a clear final view: family businesses can create stress, but your main concern is that they may favour relatives over more capable employees. The points about sharing responsibilities and discussing decisions within the family are relevant, as is the example of business disagreements affecting home life. However, the position is not fully consistent: the conclusion says the disadvantages have greater impact, while the preceding paragraph begins, “I strongly believe that although there are many advantages,” without clearly stating the comparison. Some ideas also need fuller explanation, particularly how family businesses can benefit the business itself and why favouring relatives may harm its performance. Develop each main point with a specific example or consequence and state your view consistently throughout.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting benefits, a paragraph on drawbacks, and a concluding opinion. This logical arrangement helps the reader follow the discussion, and transitions such as “To begin with” and “On the other hand” signal the change in viewpoint. To make the progression more controlled, ensure each paragraph develops one central point and that the conclusion follows directly from the argument. The final paragraph introduces favouritism as a new disadvantage rather than developing it earlier, while the conclusion refers generally to “its detractors” without specifying the disadvantages. Some linking is mechanical, and references such as “the said countries” are not very clear. Use more precise links between claims and consequences, and connect the final point to the preceding discussion.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “joint ventures,” “local job markets,” “heated argument,” and “personal relations,” which allows you to discuss both business and family effects. There are also attempts at less common expressions, but several are inaccurate or awkward, sometimes making the intended meaning less clear. For example, “double mined” does not express uncertainty naturally, and “detractors are more impact full” is an unclear way to describe the disadvantages. Spelling errors such as “indivuals,” “benificial,” and “Consquently” are noticeable. Aim for accurate collocations and check spelling carefully; choosing familiar, precise wording is more effective than using an ambitious phrase incorrectly.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including cause-and-effect structures such as “which can lead to a heated argument and can cause a serious impact on personal relations.” However, control is uneven, and errors in agreement, articles, sentence boundaries, and punctuation sometimes make the writing harder to follow. For example, “other believes” should use a plural verb, and “although their are many advantages” has an incorrect verb form. The opening also contains an incomplete construction: “From living in the same house to running the business together can be observed…” Rework such sentences into complete clauses, check subject–verb agreement, and use full stops and commas consistently. More accurate control of these patterns would make your ideas clearer.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.