Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic:
In many countries, family members work together in their family business.
Do you think family businesses have more advantages than disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In many nations, family members often work together to grow their business. In my opinion, family business have several benefits such as modern innovation and valuable manpower whereas some unavoidable drawbacks which tend to happen is conflict. I believe the advantanges outweigh disadvantanges in the long-run
Firstly, young generations who freshly complete their higher education they may contribute to the business with the modern ideas. Firm needs innovative thinking time to time to improvise efficiently in the market and graduates can definitely contribute in this sector with the help of their education. For example, family members who studied about fashion designing or business related they would help their business to grow drastically by injecting theoretical knowledge which will eventually thrive the business.
Secondly, joint family will have better manpower solution as their siblings and other relative can also join business operations at different levels. Additionally, trade will not have to recruite bodies from outside as they have trusted and valuable members available in their blood relation. This will build positive business mindset environment within the organization as they have different members available for various works. For instance, Relaince incorporation is a family business and all the employees are working in the business are within their family.
Lastly, conflicts happen in a family business because of the different opinion and due to the authority. However, proper work distribution and documentation solve the issue.
In conclusion, family business build generational wealth with the help of their family member. Blood relation add trusted manpower with modern ideology for the enterprise. Which is vital for todays businesses.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
Your position is clear: you believe the advantages of family businesses outweigh the disadvantages, and you address both benefits and a drawback. The points about graduates bringing new ideas and relatives providing trusted labour are relevant, with examples to illustrate them. However, the support is uneven. The innovation point is explained in some detail, while the manpower argument relies on broad claims, and the example of Reliance is not clearly connected to the claim that its employees are family members. The disadvantage of conflict is only briefly mentioned, and the proposed solution is asserted rather than explained. Develop this side with a specific example and explain more precisely how the benefits outweigh the risks.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, three body paragraphs signposted with “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “Lastly,” and a conclusion. This makes the main line of argument easy to follow, and the ideas generally progress from benefits to a drawback. Some linking is mechanical, however, and connections within paragraphs are not always smooth. For example, “Additionally” introduces a related point, but the following sentence about a “positive business mindset environment” does not clearly explain how having relatives in different roles creates this outcome. The final sentence beginning “Which is vital” is also disconnected from the preceding sentence. Use clearer links between claims and explanations, and make sure each paragraph develops one connected point.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a relevant range of vocabulary, including “innovative thinking,” “theoretical knowledge,” “work distribution,” and “generational wealth,” which helps communicate the topic. There are also attempts at more specific business language. However, inaccurate word choice, collocation, word forms, and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less natural: “modern innovation,” “manpower solution,” “recruite bodies,” and “advantanges” are examples. “Blood relation” is also an awkward expression in this context. These issues keep the vocabulary from being consistently precise, even though the main ideas remain understandable. Focus on standard business collocations and check spelling and word forms carefully; this will make your argument sound clearer and more natural.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “members who studied…” and a conditional-style explanation of how graduates could help. The overall meaning is usually clear, but some errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and punctuation remain. For example, “family business have” needs a plural or singular form used consistently, and “young generations who freshly complete their higher education they may contribute” has an unnecessary repeated subject and an incomplete clause structure. The final “Which is vital…” is a sentence fragment, while “Blood relation add” has a subject–verb agreement error. Review clause construction and agreement, and punctuate sentence boundaries carefully while retaining your attempts at complex structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.