Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic:
In many countries, family members work together in their family business.
Do you think family businesses have more advantages than disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Over the past few years, family business has become increasingly popular in many nations. I believe working in a family business served more merits than drawbacks. Family business is advantageous since it makes bond stronger, no need for hiring employees and overall success and profit credits should be given to the entire family. I intend to discuss why merits of this outweigh the drawbacks in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, family business creates a strong bond between family members. To elaborate it more, when all the house members work together in the same field at a same place, then they can communicate with each other frequently. Additionally, they share there problems and interests with others. Therefore, they develop emotional connections with members. As a result, family bond becomes unbreakable. Furthermore, another benefit of family business is they receieve overall credit for business's success. Hence, the credit should not devided and equally distributed among all the members which is very rare in other businesses.
Similarly, family members are enough for the business, so they do not have to hire extra employees for the work. Therefore, they are not entitled to give salary to any worker. Instead, whatever they obtain from business it is an overall profit of family. As an outcome, they can earn more and there are no limitation in an earning processs. For instance, in India, majority of family business owners are earning more compared to corporate employees.
To conclude, although sometimes family business creates a conflict between family members. I personally believe, working in a family business has more advantages than disvantages because family members can work flexible hours and they can develop more understanding for other house members. As a result, they become strong unit and they can fight against world as a unit.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
Your position is clear from the introduction: you believe family businesses have more advantages, and the conclusion restates this view. You give relevant reasons, including stronger family relationships, shared recognition for success, and avoiding the cost of hiring workers. These points address the question, but they are not all developed equally. The discussion of family bonds includes an explanation of how working together can increase communication, while the claim that family members can avoid salaries and earn more is asserted rather than examined; the India example is also broad and unsupported. You briefly acknowledge conflict but do not explain how serious it can be or weigh it against the benefits. Develop each main point with a specific example and a clearer comparison of advantages and disadvantages.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting advantages, and a conclusion that acknowledges a drawback. Ideas generally progress in a sensible order, and linking expressions such as “To commence with,” “Furthermore,” and “To conclude” help signal the stages of the argument. However, the connections can feel mechanical because several sentences begin with formulaic transitions such as “Therefore” and “As a result.” Some references are also unclear: “they” in “they receieve overall credit” could refer to the family members or the business, and “which” in the following sentence has an uncertain antecedent. The conclusion introduces flexible hours, which was not explained in the body. Link this point to an earlier argument or develop it in the main discussion, and use clearer referencing.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a range of vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “emotional connections,” “overall profit,” “corporate employees,” and “conflict.” This is enough to communicate your main ideas, and some choices show an attempt to express concepts beyond basic vocabulary. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “served more merits,” “house members,” “credit should not devided,” and “fight against world.” Spelling errors, including “receieve,” “disvantages,” and “processs,” also reduce accuracy. Some repetition of “family business,” “family members,” and “Therefore” makes the expression less flexible. Aim for natural collocations and check spelling carefully; for example, use “offers more advantages” and “family members” in place of the less idiomatic phrases.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional-style explanation beginning “when all the house members work together” and a concession in the conclusion. Most of the meaning remains understandable, but some grammatical errors affect accuracy. For example, “family business served more merits” has an incorrect verb form and sentence construction, while “there are no limitation” has a number-agreement error. In “although sometimes family business creates a conflict,” the dependent clause is punctuated as a complete sentence, and “I personally believe” should be joined to it. Articles and plural forms also need attention, as in “at a same place.” Review sentence boundaries, subject–verb agreement, and article use, then proofread each sentence while preserving your attempts at complex structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.