Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic:

In many countries, family members work together in their family business.

Do you think family businesses have more advantages than disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In different nations, relatives work together in their family. I believe that when family members work in their family business, it increases job security and promotes growth.Although drawbacks,could result from incompletance.

One of the benifit of family business provide a secure future.Faimly business give a sense of setisfication. if all the faimly member can do participate in his work they fell the sense of responsibilty.They manage all the work in a very proper way.As high level of trust among the members creates a unified vision which improves business efficiency. Moreover, children from such background can decide their career upfront and study in-depth about their business .Such as Mr Muhamad munsha has expanded their father vision across the world and turned them into multibilinor.

However,forcing someone to run a faimly business instead of following their own carrier dream can make the person miserable and cause the business fail.Preasure to run a faimly business could hamper growth or may even lead to its decline. In addition, where all members are working together, dinner table conflicts could turn into professional disprutes and vice versa. If the situations are not handled correctly, it could cause splitover in the business.This could be exemplify by seperation of many companies while handling over business to next generation due to conflicts.

In conclusion, although family business hold some potential drawbacks such as forced adoption of business or conflict leading to business division, advantages such as financial stability and unified vision among family are significant and cannot be ignored.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both the advantages and disadvantages of family businesses, presenting a clear position throughout. The writer identifies key benefits such as financial stability and a unified vision, alongside drawbacks like potential conflicts and forced career paths. However, some ideas lack full development and depth. For instance, the example provided of Mr Muhamad Munsha is somewhat vague and underdeveloped, and the phrase 'could result from incompletance' shows a limited exploration of drawbacks in the introduction. The conclusion neatly summarizes the main points. Overall, the response meets the requirements of Band 6, as all parts of the task are addressed, though certain points remain somewhat generalized or underdeveloped.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay is generally coherent and follows a logical progression, moving from an introduction to body paragraphs discussing advantages and disadvantages, and ending with a conclusion. Paragraphing is used adequately to separate distinct themes. However, cohesion is sometimes faulty or mechanical. There are repetitive transitions and awkward phrasing, such as 'One of the benifit of family business provide a secure future' and 'if all the faimly member can do participate in his work they fell the sense of responsibilty'. Referencing and linking devices are occasionally imprecise, and punctuation issues sometimes disrupt the smooth flow of ideas between sentences. These features place the response firmly in the Band 6 category for cohesion and organization.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common business and familial terms such as 'job security', 'unified vision', 'financial stability', and 'professional disputes'. However, there are frequent spelling errors ('benifit', 'Faimly', 'setisfication', 'felipe', 'Preasure', 'disprutes', 'splitover', 'exemplify') and word-choice inaccuracies (e.g., 'incompletance' instead of incompetence, 'multibilinor' instead of multi-billionaires). While these lexical errors are noticeable and detract from the precision of the text, they rarely impede overall communication. The vocabulary control aligns well with the Band 5.5 to 6.0 profile, and a score of 5.5 reflects the frequent spelling and morphological slips.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including conditional clauses ('if all the faimly member can do participate...') and concessive clauses ('Although drawbacks, could result from...'). However, grammatical accuracy is weak throughout the text. There are frequent errors in verb forms, subject-verb agreement, and article usage (e.g., 'One of the benifit... provide', 'their father vision', 'handling over business'). Punctuation is also problematic, with missing spaces after periods and awkward comma splices. Because errors are frequent and occasionally cause some difficulty for the reader, particularly when combined with spelling issues, the grammar score reflects a Band 5.0 level.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.