Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that international sports events, such as The Olympics or the Football World Cup, are a good way to bring countries together. Others say that these events create competition, not friendship, between countries.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some sports games are played on international level such as The Olympics or the Football World Cup and some people think that it is a good development to bring different countries together because it build strong relation between them and it also fosters the economic growth. However, some opponents argue that these events develop competition rather than friendship in between them because there only aim is to win competition and teams players played as rivalry.

On one hand, international players played sports together and it can lead to developing good co-relation between the sports person and games player enjoy culture, tradition and hospitality of each other state by staying there for their scheduled World Cup Match. Moreover, playing at international level can also empower economic growth as well. A clear illustration of this is that, Pakistan's Olympic Team players donate their winning amount to poor people of their homeland.

On the other hand, some human say that it is a negative development because players played as a competitors and want to win the game. Consequently, the losing team developed hatred feelings in their heart and it create hurdle in their good relationship. For instance, public of India after winning Football League started bullying their competitor on social media platforms.

In conclusion, competition is also beneficial for players as well as country because it results in competitive skill development and international sports events are necessary for better communication and strong relationship between individuals of various countries. Moreover, it also improves financial condition of playing team players.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You discuss both views and give a concluding opinion: the first body paragraph presents cultural contact and economic benefits, while the second explains how rivalry and losing can create hostility. However, the ideas are only partly developed, and your position is not fully clear: the conclusion supports competition as beneficial but also says events build relationships, without explaining how you weigh the two views. The examples are relevant in intention, but the Pakistan donation example does not clearly show how an event brings countries together, and the India example needs clearer context. The response is also 4 words below the 250-word minimum; the 9 words copied from the task prompt are not counted. Develop each example and state your view more directly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “On one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the broad organisation. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear: the first body paragraph moves from relationships to cultural experience and then to a donation example without showing the links between these points. Some connections are also mechanical or imprecise, particularly “Consequently,” where the cause-and-effect relationship is not fully explained. Improve cohesion by grouping related points, using clear references to the people or events discussed, and explaining how each example supports the paragraph’s main idea.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “international level,” “economic growth,” “competitors,” and “competitive skill development,” and the main ideas are generally understandable. There are also attempts at less common expressions, such as “fosters” and “hospitality.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, as in “good co-relation,” “develop hatred feelings,” and “playing team players.” Repetition of “players,” “game,” and “competition” also limits the range. Choose more natural combinations and check the meaning and form of less familiar words. For example, describe players as “rivals” and say that an event “can foster closer ties” rather than “build strong relation.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a contrastive opening with “However” and a conditional-style explanation beginning “because.” This shows some range, but control is inconsistent, and errors occur in many sentences. Examples include “it build strong relation,” “players played sports together,” and “it create hurdle,” where subject–verb agreement or verb forms are faulty. Articles and plurals are also problematic in phrases such as “on international level” and “a competitors.” These errors sometimes make the reader pause, although the overall meaning can usually be recovered. Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and correctly formed verb, then review articles and singular/plural nouns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.