Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that international sports events, such as The Olympics or the Football World Cup, are a good way to bring countries together. Others say that these events create competition, not friendship, between countries.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays sports become at international level that like olympics games or the football matches were played at different countries. While others think that this sports games become conflicts between two countries. I will discuss both the sides and give my opinion.

On the one hand, international events creates good relations between two countries, To elobrate this, Having a match at one country it will create more and more tourism between two nations that many sports fans were always exicited to watch in person. So, they will travel to another country to watch events. For instance, Couple of month ago there were wold cup of football in Canada there were all countries public came to watch football match in Canada it also improve friendship between many countries.

On the other hand, Few individuals belive that this kind of events will create conflits between two countries, like some countries can send their spy agents to another country to steal their database. For example, Recent news shows that in USA one spy agent was caught by US FBI she was spy agent from China, she cames as sports girl and enter the white house and trying to steal their database.

In Conclusion, While building good relationship between two countries to support sports events and olympics matches it hepls to create good economy growth between two nations and sometimes it become conflicts, between two countries. In my opinion i belive that, creating good relation and supporting sports become more suitable rather than having conflicts between two nations.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both views and state a clear preference for international sport bringing countries together, so the response is relevant to the question. The tourism example gives some support to the positive view, but the explanation that visitors create friendship is asserted rather than fully shown. The opposing view is less convincingly developed: the example about a spy entering the White House is not clearly connected to international sporting events or to competition between countries. Your conclusion repeats your position, but the claim about economic growth is introduced without support. To strengthen the response, explain how sporting rivalry can create tension, and develop examples that directly illustrate each view.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The signposts “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In Conclusion” make the overall organisation easy to follow. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and several ideas are joined in long, loosely connected sentences. For example, the Canada example moves from fans travelling to friendship without clearly explaining the link. The spy example also shifts abruptly from sports to espionage. Use clearer sentence boundaries and explain how each example supports the paragraph’s main point. Referencing such as “this kind of events” is also not always clear.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “international events,” “tourism,” “sports fans,” “conflicts,” and “economy growth,” which helps communicate the general subject. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the intended meaning harder to follow. Examples include “sports games,” “having a match at one country,” and “all countries public.” Spelling errors such as “elobrate,” “exicited,” “wold,” and “belive” are noticeable. Aim to learn natural phrases for discussing international sport and relations, and check spelling carefully. More precise vocabulary would help distinguish friendly rivalry, diplomatic tension, and economic benefits.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a contrastive opening with “While” and examples introduced by “For instance.” However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors in agreement, tense, articles, and sentence boundaries occur throughout. For example, “international events creates” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “it also improve friendship” has an incorrect verb form. The opening sentence is difficult to interpret because its clauses are not joined clearly. Punctuation also creates run-on sentences, as in the Canada example. Practise building accurate sentences with one main idea each, then add subordinate clauses only when their grammatical relationship is clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.