Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that international sports events, such as The Olympics or the Football World Cup, are a good way to bring countries together. Others say that these events create competition, not friendship, between countries.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays,international sport events are becoming more and more popular. Some people think that events create competition,not friendship,between countries,while I believe that a good way to bring countries together. These viewpoints will be discussed in the following essay.

Some people think that events create competition,not friendship,between countries. Many countries want to win game and achieve good result. Player have practise a lot ofto become better.This make player try your best during competition, their can feel stress because their want to win.Some fan argue with other fan because they feel sad when player lose This can problem between people. Therefore, event can create competition,not friendship,beteween countries.

However,I believe that a good way to bring countries together. First, people different countries can meet and make new friend,they can talk and study about life each other.They also find about different tradition.This help people understand about coutries better. Second, people can watch sport and support player favourite,they can enjoy game and share happy together.Therefore,people can understand and respect each other.

In conclusion,some people think that events create competition,not friendship,between countries,while I believe that a good way to bring countries together because help people closer and help people build friendship between countries.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both views and state your opinion: the first body paragraph explains how the desire to win can create stress and arguments among fans, while the next presents meeting people and sharing sport as ways to build understanding. However, the discussion is only partially developed. For example, the claim that fans “can talk and study about life each other” is not supported with a specific example or explanation of how this brings countries together. Your position is also incomplete in the introduction and conclusion: “I believe that a good way” lacks a clear subject and does not fully express your view. The response is 54 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop both sides. Add relevant examples and explain your reasoning more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. The contrast between the views is signalled with “However,” and the conclusion returns to your opinion, so the reader can follow the main direction. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, with repeated claims such as “create competition, not friendship” and “people can understand and respect each other.” Some links between ideas are unclear; for instance, the move from meeting people to learning about traditions needs a clearer explanation. Punctuation spacing and sentence boundaries also make the flow less smooth. To improve, organise each body paragraph around one main point, then explain it and give an example, using linking phrases selectively.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “competition,” “support,” “tradition,” and “respect.” These words help keep the response relevant to international sport. However, the range is limited and several expressions are inaccurate or repetitive, which sometimes makes meaning less clear. Examples include “win game,” “achieve good result,” “make new friend,” and “support player favourite.” There are also spelling errors such as “beteween” and “coutries.” Aim to learn common word partnerships and check spelling carefully. More precise terms such as “national teams,” “sportsmanship,” or “cultural exchange” would help you explain the topic with greater clarity and variety.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including a reason-and-result structure with “because” and a contrast introduced by “while.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to read. For example, “I believe that a good way to bring countries together” is missing a subject and a complete verb phrase; “This make player try your best” has problems with agreement and pronoun reference; and “because help people closer” is incomplete. Several sentences also run together without clear punctuation. Practise building accurate subject–verb–object sentences first, then extend them with one clause at a time. Check agreement, articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries during proofreading.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.