Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that international sports events, such as The Olympics or the Football World Cup, are a good way to bring countries together. Others say that these events create competition, not friendship, between countries.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There is an ongoing debate about whether it is beneficial for countries to host international sport competitions such as olympics and football world cup to build strong relationships with other nations. On the other hand, a few people believe that it creates competition or conflicts among countries. I will discuss both perspectives and explain why I believe that hosting international events helps building better relations.

To begin with, there are a few reasons why people think that hosting events bringing countries closer. Firstly, when a country organize an event in their territory, they provide invitation to people of other nations. When public gets together at stadium, people discuss their opinions and beliefs with each other which not only helps people to understand about different cultures but also resolve the misconceptions about each other.

In contrast, many people think that this creates unnecessary tensions and conflicts between countries. For example, sometimes a few countries do not easily provide visas to educated and wealthy people who belongs to underdeveloped nations even-though they fulfill the visa requirements. As a result, that create problems which later turns into hatred. Secondly, when a country lost to their rival nation, people start fighting with each other out of frustration and a news article revealed that over the last ten years more than hundred individuals got harmed during an event.

From my perspective, although some people think that these International events creates conflicts among other nations, I am convinced that hosting olympics and football matches brings people closer and these initiatives helps the countries to maintain better relations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and state a clear opinion: you argue that international events help countries build better relations, while also describing tensions linked to visas and defeat. These points are relevant, and the example of spectators meeting and discussing cultural differences helps explain the positive view. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the positive argument is mostly asserted, while the visa example is not clearly connected to the sporting event itself. The claim that more than a hundred people were harmed is also vague, with no context to show how this supports the broader point. To strengthen the response, explain how sporting events can foster cooperation beyond stadium conversations, and make the examples more specific and directly relevant.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting the positive view, a contrasting paragraph, and a conclusion that restates your position. Signposting such as “To begin with,” “In contrast,” and “From my perspective” makes the progression easy to follow. This meets the lower-band expectations securely, and the paragraphing supports the discussion. To show more flexible cohesion, avoid relying mainly on formulaic transitions and make the links between claims clearer. For instance, the visa example appears under the argument about sporting tensions, but the connection between visa restrictions and the events is not explained. The reference to “that” in “that create problems” is also unclear. Use more precise referencing and connect each example explicitly to the point it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “international sport competitions,” “misconceptions,” “tensions,” and “frustration.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and some less common terms show an attempt to express nuanced points. However, several word choices and collocations are imprecise or repetitive, such as “provide invitation,” “underdeveloped nations,” and repeated use of “countries” and “people.” “Educated and wealthy” also seems an unclear description in the visa example. Aim for more natural, precise phrasing and vary key terms where appropriate. For example, you could describe “granting visas to visitors from developing countries” and refer to “spectators” or “supporters” rather than repeatedly using “people.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “people discuss their opinions and beliefs … which not only helps…” and a concessive structure beginning “although.” The overall meaning remains understandable, but some errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction reduce accuracy. Examples include “when a country organize,” “when a country lost,” and “these initiatives helps”; the verbs should agree with their subjects and maintain the intended tense. In “that create problems which later turns into hatred,” the clauses also need clearer agreement. Review subject–verb agreement and past-tense consistency, and check articles and sentence boundaries. More accurate control of these patterns would make your complex sentences clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.