Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that international sports events, such as The Olympics or the Football World Cup, are a good way to bring countries together. Others say that these events create competition, not friendship, between countries.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Few people believe that bringing all nations to a host country who is organising a big sports event such as the football world cup or the olympics is a better way to unite and strengthen countries relations, whereas other believe that these events are pathetic and brings rivalaries among the nations. In this essay I will discuss both the opinions and give my opinion in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, it is a great opportunity for country to showcase their talents in the competition. The players have a chance to highlight their skills, strength and endurance in a game. The performers can get recognition by wining the tournament titles. For instance, nobody knew the country Cape de Verde until they clear the playoffs and enter the FIFA cup. They represent the company by wining the games and entering into the quater finals. Secondly, the country gains huge popularity and tourism can increase in the particular country. Thirdly, new business oportunities and significant revenue streams are generated by opening a new stadium or coaching facilities. Therefore, it is beneficial to host countries as well as the nations who are coming to play in the host country.

On the other hand, people argue that thisevents bring grudges and ignite rivalaries between the countries. It is believed that fan violence can put pressure on players to perform well. The players are continuosly distracted and teased so they loose the game. The another point is the host country may detoriate the facilities of other countries so their own country wins the game. For instance, the host country may serve low nutrition food to the other team to prevent wining the game at all cost. However, the elective presidents of events are making sure that there is no more unfair games or any type of politics scandal. Therefore, hosting big events brings more unity towards the countries.

In conclusion, I would reiterate my opinion that trade relations and frendships are improved by inviting several officials into the events. All the countries enjoyed watching Olympics and they bring proud movements for people living in that country.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt partially, discussing both the benefits of international sports events and the potential for rivalry, while including a personal opinion. However, the development of ideas remains limited and under-developed. For instance, the point regarding Cape Verde is factually confused and lacks sufficient depth to fully support the argument about national recognition. Similarly, the points regarding tourism and business opportunities in the second paragraph are merely listed rather than extended with specific explanations or examples. The position is stated at the beginning and end, but the overall treatment of the prompt tends to be generalised and lacks the thorough exploration required for a higher level. To improve, you should ensure that every main idea is fully elaborated with clear explanations and relevant supporting details.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays some organisation with clear paragraph breaks and basic cohesive devices such as 'To begin with', 'Secondly', and 'On the other hand'. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression in places, and some cohesive devices are used mechanically or repetitively. Referencing is occasionally unclear, such as the pronoun use in phrases like 'thisevents bring grudges', where spacing and referencing lack precision. While the overall arrangement is coherent enough to follow the general line of argument, the transitions between sentences can feel abrupt. To achieve a higher level, you need to ensure smoother logical progression between sentences and use a wider, more flexible range of cohesive devices without relying on formulaic listing words.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate to convey the basic message. There are noticeable errors in word choice, spelling, and word form that cause some difficulty for the reader, such as 'wining' instead of 'winning', 'quater' instead of 'quarter', 'oportunities' instead of 'opportunities', and 'detoriate' instead of 'deteriorate'. Furthermore, collocations are occasionally unnatural, such as 'bring rivalaries' or 'politics scandal'. You attempt some less common vocabulary items, but inaccuracies in spelling and lexical control prevent a smoother reading experience. To improve this area, you should expand your range of vocabulary, pay close attention to correct spelling, and ensure that words are used in appropriate collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The text demonstrates a limited range of sentence structures, with frequent errors that can cause difficulty for the reader. There are noticeable issues with article usage ('a host country who is organising', 'the football world cup'), subject-verb agreement ('other believe', 'thisevents bring'), and plurals ('countries relations'). Attempts at complex sentences often contain structural flaws or faulty punctuation, such as run-on clauses and awkward phrasing like 'the players are continuosly distracted and teased so they loose the game'. Grammatical control is inconsistent throughout the essay. To reach a higher standard, you should focus on reducing basic grammatical errors, improving control over complex sentence patterns, and refining punctuation and article usage.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.