Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that international sports events, such as The Olympics or the Football World Cup, are a good way to bring countries together. Others say that these events create competition, not friendship, between countries.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

some individuals have prespective regarding international games like the olympics or football world cup these type event provide people's opportunity visite another country that makes countries relationship better more. while other think that this enhance competition attitude between nations rather than make their relation strong more. i believe that international games is good way to know other country 's culture, languge, food so this time people experience new thing which help to make country's relations. i will dicuss these statements in the upcomming paragraphs along with my opinion.

on the one hand, people who believe that international sport events are one of good methods to make country's good relation. the first reason why they think this, during that time people who belong from another country they experience new thing such as language, food, culture and tradition. this thing enhance their interest more to get knowledge relating this more. so their learning excitement increase. they spend time more there, this help their relation good with other country. moreover this time many businessman visit to watch gsmes that time they experience new buiness method like regarding their products, services which promote their business.

on the other hand people think that this only make competion behavior not bring relation better, because every person wants that time their country's team win. if they face any failiur they have not excitement to stay another nation.

i think when two teams play between only one team win so that time not only visitors but also players learn new things which help them to make new stretagy.

to conclude, although this thing make competition between nations, this make relation good cause mant people learn new things during this time.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the main parts of the task by discussing both views—that international sports events bring countries together and that they create competition—along with a personal opinion. However, the ideas are limited and under-developed, which keeps the response at this level. For instance, the discussion on cultural exchange in the first body paragraph mentions food, language, and tradition, but these points are not fully extended or supported with specific examples from the Olympics or World Cup. Similarly, the counterargument regarding competition is brief and lacks depth, only stating that people want their team to win and experience failure. The writer does attempt to present a clear position throughout the essay, but the lack of thorough explanation and extension prevents the ideas from being more fully realized.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

There is some organisation in the essay, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, and the writer attempts to sequence ideas logically. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression, and the arrangement feels somewhat disjointed. Cohesive devices are either inadequate or repetitive, with simple connectors like 'on the one hand', 'on the other hand', and 'to conclude' used to structure the text, but internal cohesion within paragraphs is frequently faulty. For example, referencing is not always clear, as seen in phrases like 'this thing enhance their interest', where the exact antecedent is ambiguous. Paragraphing is attempted, but the grouping of ideas lacks smooth transitions, making the overall flow mechanical and sometimes difficult to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates a limited but minimally adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common topics related to international events, culture, and business. However, there are noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and spelling throughout the essay that cause some difficulty for the reader. Examples of inaccurate word choices and forms include 'prespective' instead of perspective, 'visite' instead of visit, 'languge' instead of language, 'competion' instead of competition, 'failiur' instead of failure, and 'stretagy' instead of strategy. Additionally, collocation is often unnatural, such as 'make country's good relation' or 'competition behavior'. These lexical inaccuracies and frequent spelling errors restrict the precision of the argument and impede smooth communication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response shows a very limited range of sentence structures, relying primarily on simple sentences or attempts at complex sentences that are frequently faulty. There are frequent grammatical errors relating to verb forms and tenses, subject-verb agreement, missing articles, and prepositions within grammatical patterns. For example, sentences often lack necessary auxiliary verbs or correct inflection, such as 'these type event provide people's opportunity' and 'international games is good way'. Punctuation is also problematic, with sentences running together without proper capitalisation or terminal punctuation in places. These frequent grammatical errors cause significant strain and difficulty for the reader in interpreting the intended meaning.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.