Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that international sports events, such as The Olympics or the Football World Cup, are a good way to bring countries together. Others say that these events create competition, not friendship, between countries.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is often argue that major international sporting competitions, such as the Olympic Games and FIFA world cup, serve as a powerful tool to unite the nations. Other believe that these games only fuel fierce competition and rivalry. In my opinion, although these tournaments can be the reason of tension, they ultimately do more to bring the world together throught cultural exchange.

On one hand side, during these international tournaments people often get influenced by the politics statements as well as new reporters headlines which cause the pressure in players to win the game and audience to show power to the oponent team somehow this cause competition stress, so teams rather than enjoying solely winning belief.

On the other hand, these competition offer incredible opportunities to bridge cutural divides together and prompt peace. Mega-events often bring th spectator together

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You state a relevant position: although tournaments can create tension, they ultimately bring countries together through cultural exchange. You also begin to address both views, mentioning political influence and pressure to win on one side, and the potential to bridge cultural divides on the other. However, the response is only a partial discussion: neither view is developed with a clear explanation or a relevant example, and the second argument ends mid-sentence. The response also falls 111 words short of the required minimum, leaving too little space to explain your reasoning and fully answer the prompt. To improve, develop each side with a specific example and explain how it supports your view, then add a concluding statement that reinforces your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is a basic attempt to organise the response: an introduction presents the issue and your opinion, followed by paragraphs beginning “On one hand side” and “On the other hand.” These signals help readers recognise the two perspectives. However, the ideas do not progress clearly within the body paragraphs. The first body sentence combines several points—media coverage, political statements, pressure on players, and audience behaviour—without showing their relationships clearly. The final paragraph stops at “Mega-events often bring th spectator together,” so the argument is left incomplete. Use shorter, logically connected sentences, explain one main idea at a time, and complete each paragraph with a supporting example or consequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt some topic-specific vocabulary, including “international sporting competitions,” “fierce competition and rivalry,” and “cultural exchange.” These choices show an effort to discuss the issue beyond very basic terms. However, inaccurate spelling and word choice are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning harder to follow: “throught,” “oponent,” and “cutural” are misspelled, while “the reason of tension” and “show power to the oponent team” are unnatural expressions. Some wording is also imprecise, such as “politics statements.” Build accuracy by learning common collocations for sport and international relations, and proofread spelling. More precise phrases such as “political statements,” “create tension,” and “display national pride” would make your ideas clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both a complex opening sentence and longer cause-and-effect structures, for example, “although these tournaments can be the reason of tension, they ultimately do more…” This shows some willingness to use more than simple sentences. However, control is inconsistent, and several sentence structures are difficult to follow. In “Other believe,” the subject and verb do not agree; “these competition offer” also needs plural agreement. The first body sentence runs several clauses together without clear punctuation, making the relationships between ideas unclear. The final sentence is incomplete. Practise subject–verb agreement, articles and plural forms, and divide long sentences into complete clauses with appropriate punctuation. Aim for a mix of accurate simple sentences and carefully controlled complex ones.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.