Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that international sports events, such as The Olympics or the Football World Cup, are a good way to bring countries together. Others say that these events create competition, not friendship, between countries.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In today's complex world, numerous issues and topics are subject to debate. One such topic is oversea sports events, many individuals argue that this is the good way to make good realtions with other countries. While others have compeletly opposite views. It is important to explore both sides of the argument to gain a comprhensive understanding. In this essay, both sides of the topic will be dicussed followed by my opinion.

On the one hand, sports play a crusial role in our life and sports event bring people close to eatch other. In other words, local games connect us with national and same way national games connect a country with other country. Events like Olympics and Fifa world cup where many countries get togather. When people in power visit other countries while suppurt their team they meet with other Governments and make new deals with them. As result, countries grow economcaly.

On the other hand, when ever we play as a team . We feel the oppnent team as enamy. To explicate it, when a team represent a whole country . A simple game convert into war. people become angry if their team lose. Its also effect leader's emotions. There are also a lot of controversies around hosting matches in their country.

In conclusion, although there are many negetive points for international sports events. Yet, there are many people who take games as entertainment and encourge others to do activies. Host an international event and give a chance to tialented people is important.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both views: the first body paragraph presents international sport as a way to connect people and governments, while the second explains how national teams can intensify rivalry. Your conclusion also signals a generally positive view, but the position is not fully clear: it mentions negative points before shifting to the benefits of entertainment and opportunity without directly weighing the two sides. Several ideas remain under-developed. For example, “countries grow economically” is asserted without explaining how sporting events lead to this outcome, and the claim that a game can “convert into war” needs a more precise explanation or example. State your opinion directly and support each main point with a clear reason or relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” help signal the contrast, so the overall arrangement is coherent. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow. The move from supporters meeting governments to “new deals” and economic growth is abrupt, and the final paragraph does not clearly synthesise the discussion or restate a definite position. Some linking is mechanical, and sentence boundaries are occasionally confusing, as in “When people in power visit other countries while suppurt their team they meet…” and the fragments beginning “Events like Olympics…” and “Host an international event…”. Develop one point at a time and connect each example explicitly to the claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “international sports events,” “controversies,” “hosting matches,” and “entertainment.” This gives you enough language to communicate the general subject, but the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors make parts of the response harder to understand. Examples include “oversea sports events,” “make good realtions,” “feel the oppnent team as enamy,” and “give a chance to tialented people.” Repeated general words such as “good,” “people,” and “countries” also reduce precision. Build a bank of accurate phrases for cooperation, rivalry, and hosting, and check spelling carefully. More precise vocabulary would help you explain the ideas without relying on broad or unclear expressions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including “While others have completely opposite views” and a conditional-style explanation of how national representation can affect competition. However, the range is limited, and complex attempts are often faulty. For example, “While others have…” is a dependent clause presented as a sentence, while “Events like Olympics and Fifa world cup where many countries get togather” lacks a complete main clause. There are also recurring problems with agreement and verb forms, as in “sports event bring” and “a simple game convert,” as well as sentence-boundary and punctuation errors. These issues sometimes make relationships between ideas unclear. Practise complete sentences, subject–verb agreement, and joining clauses with accurate conjunctions.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.