Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In today's world, there are many large international companies provide their workers the opportunity to spend of time living and working in another country. There are numerous benefits for employees and companies. I firmly believe that when staff could work in different location it would contribute to employees' career pathway.

Firstly, there are numerous chain companies need to send exchange program in tourism industry. It would assist to saving cost of staff salary and consumption. In addition their worker will learn new strategies and cultures. On the other hand their colleague would be satisfy because what company provide such flight ticket, accommodation or order expenses. Experts have suggested that online working can enhance staffs' qualifications. For instance, Hilton group has loyaly program who works with them since 5 year, they send to different continent for gaining new skills. Therefore, challenges can enhance staffs' abilities.

Secondly, companies have many advantages when they sent their collegues to different place, it would contribute to individuals' personel performances. They can obtain new stuffs such as cultures,langueges and abilities. In same time both side will be happy for example if companies encouraged them with some benefits, they would motivate in working duties. Hence, experience worker have been working since many years they may require to change working envinroment.

To sum up, international groups offer to their peer the new challenge to work in short period in different place it can help increasing staffs' performance, and they would be motivate it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You address both questions by mentioning employee learning and motivation, as well as possible benefits to companies, and you give a Hilton example. However, the response only partially develops these points: the company advantages are not clearly distinguished from benefits to employees, and claims such as “assist to saving cost” are not explained. The opening also gives a position about career development, but this is not sustained or clearly connected to the examples. The response contains 237 words, so it is 13 words below the required minimum; the 8 words copied from the task prompt were not counted. To strengthen the answer, explain specific benefits for each group and support them with relevant, clearly explained examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “Secondly” and “To sum up” make the broad structure visible. However, the ideas do not progress consistently within the paragraphs. For example, the first body paragraph moves from cost savings to staff learning, colleague satisfaction and an online-working claim, without showing how these points connect. The second paragraph repeats the idea that employees gain skills rather than developing the company’s advantages. Some linking phrases, including “On the other hand” and “Hence,” do not clearly express the relationship between the sentences. Group related ideas together, use references that make the subject clear, and explain each point before moving to the next.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “international companies,” “accommodation,” “cultures” and “qualifications,” and you attempt phrases such as “career pathway” and “working environment.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, which sometimes makes the meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “send exchange program,” “order expenses,” “new stuffs” and “personel performances.” Spelling errors such as “loyaly,” “collegues” and “envinroment” also reduce clarity. Aim for precise, natural combinations and check spelling carefully. For instance, describe companies as “sending employees on an exchange programme” and refer to “professional performance” or “work-related skills” rather than using unclear phrases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a conditional structure in “if companies encouraged them … they would motivate,” and the overall meaning can often be followed. However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently in sentence construction, verb forms, agreement and articles. The opening, “there are many large international companies provide,” combines structures incorrectly; “when staff could work” does not fit the intended general meaning, and “their colleague would be satisfy” has problems with number and verb form. Some sentences also lack clear grammatical connections between clauses. Practise building accurate basic sentences first, then add subordinate clauses, checking that each clause has a subject and correctly formed verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.