Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.
Why might this opportunity be good for employees?
What advantages does this development have for companies?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Working in International companies is a good option to enhance our lifestyles. These days there are plethora of franchies which offer their employees to soend time living and working abroad. This is a great opportunity for them in many ways.
Firstly, living and working abroad can help them to improve their lifestyle which not only include their way of living but also interacting with others. Living the other country can help a person to live according to the environment around. Secondly, it can assist them in learning about different cultures and languages. There are number of different peoples living there from different nations which can help them to interact with them and learn about different languages which will not only improve their speaking skills but also their confidence. Lastly, it will help them in time management. They will learn to manage their time efficiently because living far away from home will teach them to be managed and organized because they have to handle each and every thing by themseleves.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0
You address the first question by mentioning cultural learning, language skills, confidence and time management, but the response does not answer the second question about advantages for companies. The employee benefits are listed rather than explained with specific examples, and the opening claim about improving “lifestyles” remains vague. The response therefore covers the task only minimally, with limited development of relevant ideas. It is also 81 words below the required minimum, leaving too little space to explain both parts adequately. To improve, give each question a clear section, explain how each benefit works, and add a relevant example—for instance, how an overseas assignment can help a company build local knowledge or develop future managers.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has a basic structure: an introduction followed by a paragraph about employee benefits. Sequencing words such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “Lastly” make the list easy to follow. However, there is no paragraph addressing the company advantages, so the overall progression is incomplete. The repeated list format also makes the development feel mechanical, and some links between ideas are unclear—for example, the connection between living abroad and “improve their lifestyle” is not explained. Organise the response into distinct paragraphs for the two questions, and use linking phrases to show cause and effect rather than relying mainly on numbered transitions. A concluding sentence would also help bring the response to a clear close.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use some relevant vocabulary, including “different cultures,” “languages,” “confidence,” and “time management,” which helps communicate the main employee benefits. There are also attempts at more specific expressions such as “manage their time efficiently” and “interacting with others.” However, the range is limited and several choices or spellings are inaccurate, including “franchies,” “soend,” and “different peoples.” Phrases such as “improve their lifestyle” and “each and every thing” are vague or unnatural in this context. Aim for more precise language about professional development and company benefits, and check spelling and collocations carefully. This would make the ideas clearer and more appropriate for a formal essay.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a relative clause in “which will not only improve their speaking skills but also their confidence.” Most of the meaning remains understandable, but errors in sentence structure and agreement recur. For example, “which not only include” should agree with the singular idea of “lifestyle,” and “Living the other country” is missing a necessary preposition and article. The sentence beginning “They will learn to manage their time” also becomes difficult to follow because several reasons are joined together without clear punctuation. Practise accurate article use, subject–verb agreement and sentence boundaries, while keeping complex sentences controlled. Clearer sentence construction will help your ideas come across more reliably.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.