Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

These days employees in the international companies are given an opportunity to spend their time working and living in an another country. It is a good way for employees to improve their skill set by working in different environments and also get a lot of exposure to the new technologies. Companies can effectively use their employees to fulfil the duties and improve company's productivity.

The chance of working in abroad is a valuable opportunity for an employee as it helps them to work in different environments. Employees can experience new technologies and can adapt to the smartest ways to complete their work. For example, when a employee has a chance to attend international seminars it gives him an international exposure and benefit to improve his critical thinking abilities. As a result, employee can improve his skills, share his ideas and can have a great exposure to advanced technologies.

One of the main advantages of this development is employees having high skill set can be used efficiently when there is a requirement of the resource. This helps the company not only to finish their projects in time but also improves their productivity. For example, if a project is short staffed and there is a need for a developer they can fill the developer position from different country and fulfil the project requirements. As a result, company can meet their deadlines in time which helps them to attract more clients to the company.

In conclusion , I believe that employees living and working in different countries are exposed to different work cultures, which helps them to improve their knowledge which can be used to design useful applications. Therefore, it can benefit the company to grab more business and grow financially.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: benefits for employees and advantages for companies. The ideas are relevant and clear, though the development is somewhat repetitive. For instance, the points about 'new technologies' and 'different environments' are mentioned in both the introduction and the body paragraphs without significant expansion. To reach a higher band, you should aim to provide more distinct, nuanced examples. While the position is clear, the supporting arguments could be more varied to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic. Overall, the response covers all requirements of the task effectively.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two main ideas. Cohesive devices such as 'For example', 'As a result', and 'In conclusion' are used to link ideas, although some transitions feel a bit mechanical. The progression of ideas is generally clear, but the referencing is occasionally repetitive, such as the frequent use of 'employee' and 'company' at the start of sentences. Improving the variety of cohesive links would enhance the flow and coherence of the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the message to be conveyed clearly. You use some topic-specific terms like 'skill set', 'international exposure', and 'critical thinking'. However, there is a reliance on basic vocabulary, and some collocations are slightly unnatural, such as 'working in abroad' (should be 'working abroad') and 'grab more business' (which is informal). To improve, try to incorporate more sophisticated synonyms and idiomatic expressions. The range is sufficient to communicate your points, but it lacks the precision and flexibility required for a higher band score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is always clear, there are recurring grammatical errors. For example, 'in the international companies' (should be 'in international companies'), 'a employee' (should be 'an employee'), and 'in different country' (should be 'in a different country'). Punctuation is generally correct, though there is an unnecessary space before the comma in 'In conclusion ,'. The majority of sentences are understandable, but the frequency of minor errors in articles and prepositions prevents the writing from reaching a higher band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.