Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

At present, this is seen that staff are getting offers from large international companies for work and to spend a period of time residing in another state. In my opinion, this opportunity is beneficial for employees in making strong international relations. Furthermore, they have learning opportunity from different exposure and experience. The main advantage is representation of the company worldwide.

As I believe ,this opportunity is really helpful in making strong international relations. For instance, when staff work in different country, they meet new people, communicate with them and discuss about their work. They get to know about different learning experiences.

Another reason is, this opportunity is a prospect for employees in learning new ideas and strategies from different people globally. This increase their knowledge of work. For example, they become more professional and experienced by working in different country with a variety of people.

Moreover, the main advantage is the representation of the company globally. When staff work worldwide, they recognize their company everywhere. As a result, the economy of companies increases worldwide with recognition. Also people get to know about companies from different places.

In conclusion, this is widely known that nowadays large international companies are offering their staff the opportunity to live and work in different states. This opportunity is better for employees to learn and gain experience. Another benefit is making strong international relations worldwide. The key advantage for companies is their rec

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt, discussing benefits for employees and companies. However, the essay is under the 250-word minimum, which limits the depth of development. The ideas are somewhat repetitive, particularly regarding 'international relations' and 'learning,' and the conclusion is incomplete, cutting off mid-sentence. While the main points are relevant, they lack the necessary extension and specific examples required for a higher band. The position is clear, but the overall development is insufficient to fully satisfy the task requirements.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the progression of ideas is somewhat mechanical. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Furthermore,' 'For instance,' and 'Moreover,' but they are sometimes used repetitively or in a way that feels forced. The referencing is occasionally unclear, and the abrupt ending significantly impacts the overall coherence of the piece. To improve, you should focus on creating smoother transitions between sentences and ensuring that each paragraph has a clear, fully developed conclusion.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but remains quite basic and repetitive. Phrases like 'making strong international relations' and 'learning new ideas' are used multiple times. There is little evidence of less common lexical items or idiomatic language. Word choice is sometimes imprecise, such as using 'state' when 'country' or 'nation' would be more appropriate in this context. To reach a higher band, you should aim to incorporate a wider range of topic-specific vocabulary and synonyms to avoid repetition and demonstrate more precise control over word choice.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay relies heavily on simple sentence structures. While there are some attempts at complex sentences, they are often marred by grammatical errors, such as 'this is seen that' or 'this increase their knowledge.' There are frequent errors in subject-verb agreement and article usage (e.g., 'in different country' instead of 'in a different country'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with spacing around commas. While the meaning is generally clear, the lack of a wider range of complex structures and the persistence of basic grammatical errors limit the score in this criterion.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.