Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Nowadays, many multinational companies appoint their staff to work overseas in various countries for a certain period of time. I believe, that this opportunity is beneficial for employees as they get a chance to explore working in different work environment. At, the same time companies can also benefit from the employees having international experience.

To begin with, the employees one advantage to work overseas is to gain professional experience, working in a different country helps them to gain new working methods, technologies and management. As a result, it helps them to gain valuable experience that may reflect further in the future. Also, working in different country allows the employer to learn and adapt the cultural values and further implement in their lives. On top of that, it also helps employees to learn and communicate in different language which will be a extra skill to add in their resume. For instance, an employee from Canada who spend years in working in Japan may learn to communicate effectively with different people and adapt to unfamiliar situations.

Also, campanies can gain several advantages from the employee who has international experience. Firstly, employees who return from the international assignment gain new knowledge and strategies which may help the companies to spread their marketting and increase the sales. Also, nowadays poeple who are billingual gets more attention, companies who send their employees to work overseas may use their ability to communicate with other companies. For instance, a employee who is working in Japan for years, it may become a mediator to translate and onvey the messgaes to the company in Canada.

In conclusion, working abroad can provide employees with valuable professional and personal experience, while companies can benefit from their increased skills, knowledge and understanding of international markets. Therefore, this development can be advantageous to both employees and employers.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response successfully addresses all parts of the prompt by explaining both why the opportunity is good for employees and what advantages it brings to companies. The student maintains a clear position throughout the essay. Ideas are extended and supported, such as when the writer discusses gaining new working methods, technologies, management skills, and language acquisition, alongside commercial advantages like marketing expansion and bilingual mediation. Examples are provided, although some of the supporting details tend to be slightly repetitive in phrasing. Nevertheless, the main tasks are fully covered, meeting the requirements of a Band 7 performance where all parts are addressed with a clear position and supported ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay displays a clear overall progression and logical organisation throughout. Paragraphing is used appropriately to divide the introduction, body paragraphs focusing on employees and companies respectively, and the conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'To begin with', 'As a result', 'On top of that', and 'Firstly' are utilised to connect ideas, although some transitions feel slightly mechanical. Referencing is generally clear, though minor slips like 'campanies' and punctuation errors around transitional phrases slightly disrupt the flow. Overall, the logical structure and clear progression satisfy the criteria for a Band 6.5 to 7.0, fitting comfortably into a solid Band 6.5.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully attempting less common lexical items such as 'multinational companies', 'professional experience', 'cultural values', and 'international assignment'. However, there are noticeable spelling and word choice errors, including 'campanies' instead of 'companies', 'poeple', 'billingual', and awkward phrasing like 'convey the messgaes'. While these errors do not impede communication, they prevent the lexical score from reaching higher bands. The writer shows an ability to discuss business and employment topics effectively, aligning well with the Band 6 descriptor.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating attempts at subordination and relative clauses, such as 'employees who return from the international assignment gain new knowledge...' However, there are frequent grammatical and punctuation errors, including comma splices ('I believe, that this opportunity'), article omissions ('in different work environment'), preposition misuse ('spend years in working'), and subject-verb agreement issues ('a employee who is working... it may become'). Despite these errors, the meaning remains clear throughout, and communication is rarely impeded. This balance of complex structures alongside recurring grammatical inaccuracies reflects the Band 6 descriptor.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.