Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In the contemporary society, many companies do sponser their choosen staff to live and work abroad for a short period of time. No doubt, this opportunity is beneficial for both the company and the employees of that organization. This essay will discuss its effects on both parties.

Large international companies are growing at a quite faster pace nowadays. They usually consists of various braches in major industrial hubs all over the world. After evaluating their employees, many of these organizations offer the opportunity to gain some experience from abroad. This chance includes living and working abroad for a brief period of time to gain relevant experience. There is no second opinion that such window in their professional career will be of great help. For example, by working in a different country and different space with all together different people will let them explore their abilities, emhance their communication skills and make them more adaptive to work in competitive environment.

Nevertheless, this break will not only benefit employees but also play a significant role in the development of that organization. It provides major breakthrough in the success of their company. For example. by sponsoring them they not only get skillful workers in return but also got more international clients to work with and generate more revenue.

In conclusion, this whole activity proves as a catslyst for both the personal growth of the staff and organization's growth. It will also provide an environment of healthy competition because everyone will try to avail this golden opportunity.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing why international secondments are beneficial for employees and what advantages they offer to companies. Your position is clear throughout the essay. The ideas presented, such as exploring abilities, enhancing communication, and generating more revenue, are relevant, though some points remain slightly under-developed. For example, the explanation of how companies gain more international clients could be further extended with more specific examples. Overall, you have covered the requirements of the task well, providing a logical framework that addresses both prompt questions appropriately, corresponding closely to the Band 6.0 descriptors.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

Your essay has a clear overall structure and is divided into logical paragraphs with an introduction, body paragraphs addressing employees and companies respectively, and a conclusion. However, cohesion at the sentence level is occasionally faulty or mechanical. For instance, the transition 'Nevertheless, this break will not only benefit employees...' is slightly misused since the previous paragraph already established benefits for employees, making 'nevertheless' semantically awkward. Additionally, referencing is sometimes unclear, and punctuation errors appear in transitional phrases, such as 'For example. by sponsoring them...', where a full stop is mistakenly used instead of a comma. These minor issues place your coherence and cohesion performance within the Band 6.0 bracket.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common items such as 'contemporary society', 'industrial hubs', and 'catalyst'. However, there are several noticeable spelling and word-choice errors that detract from precision. For example, 'doster' is misspelled as 'soster' (companies do sponser), 'chosen' is spelled 'choosen', 'branches' is misspelled 'braches', 'enhance' is written as 'emhance', and 'catalyst' is misspelled 'catslyst'. Furthermore, phrases like 'all together different people' should be 'altogether different'. While these errors do not impede communication, their frequency prevents the lexical score from reaching Band 7.0, aligning it instead with Band 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over grammar with complex attempts like 'After evaluating their employees, many of these organizations offer the opportunity...'. However, there are several grammatical and mechanical inaccuracies throughout the text. Noticeable errors include subject-verb agreement issues like 'They usually consists of various braches', punctuation errors in sentence boundaries such as 'For example. by sponsoring them...', and awkward phrasing like 'got more international clients'. These errors occur with some frequency, though they rarely impede overall communication. This performance fits the Band 6.0 descriptor profile, which accommodates a mix of simple and complex structures alongside recurring errors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.