Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is commonly seen that most of the international companies get chance to their employees for doing work and living in other nations. I will explain numerous reasons behind it is effective for their staff as well as how it is benefit for companies which are elobrate in upcoming parargraphs.

Giving chance to do work for staff in another country has a lot of causes. First and foremost is that learn new skills. To elobrate it more, employees get opportunity to do work or live in another nations's environment where they can do work another employees and share their ideas and methods which are helpful for them to gain vast knowledge. As a result, they get chance to improve their work opportunities by using this knowledge. For example, if company in Canada also get chance to move Japan nation for doing work. Staff learn skills of Japan related to work which useful in their job opportunity. In addition, improve communication is other reason because they learn new language of another country that is beneficial for them to adjust in environment.

On the other hand, there are some advantages to compaines for moving staff in another companies. The most preponderant is that better international business. If employees do work in another country, they will become able to understand culture and needs of customers of foreign countries which would helpful for building the strengthen relationship between countries. For instance, if emplyoess get chance to do work in Japan they leran culture and requirments of customers in markets. Hence, canada company would easily start import and export business with Japan. Apart from this, employees can share knowledge with their comany which they get during work in other nations. Consquently, business will growth by apply this information.

Conclusion, although there are plenty of reasons for better employees doing work in another nations, comapnies have also get benefits to improve bonding another countries which will useful for increase the productivity of the business.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt, exploring why the international working opportunity is good for employees and what advantages it brings to companies. The writer puts forward relevant ideas, such as employees gaining new skills, improving communication, and learning foreign cultures, while companies benefit through better international business and increased productivity. However, the development of these ideas is frequently hindered by lack of clarity, underdeveloped explanations, and repetitive phrasing. For instance, the discussion of the Canadian and Japanese companies is muddled and lacks precise examples. The position is clear, but the ideas tend to be over-generalized and insufficiently extended, placing this response squarely at Band 5.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The text is organized into paragraphs with an introduction, body paragraphs for each prompt part, and a conclusion. However, the overall progression is disrupted by mechanical and inadequate use of cohesive devices, such as 'To elobrate it more', 'First and foremost', and 'On the other hand'. Referencing is frequently unclear, and pronoun use fails to establish a smooth flow between sentences. Paragraphing is attempted, but the internal logical links within paragraphs are weak, causing the reader some difficulty in following the line of argument. This corresponds to a Band 5.0.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and repetitive, with noticeable errors that occasionally impede communication or cause strain for the reader. Words are frequently used in the wrong word class or with incorrect collocations, such as 'benefit for companies which are elobrate in upcoming parargraphs', 'Japan nation', and 'business will growth by apply this information'. Spelling errors are frequent ('elobrate', 'parargraphs', 'compaines', 'emplyoess', 'leran', 'Consquently', 'comapnies'). While the writer attempts some less common vocabulary like 'preponderant' and 'import and export', the frequent inaccuracies and basic nature of the lexical choices limit the score to Band 5.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.0

The response demonstrates a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on simple sentences and faulty attempts at complex structures. Frequent errors in tense, subject-verb agreement, articles, and prepositions are evident throughout the text, for example: 'most of the international companies get chance to their employees', 'employees get opportunity to do work or live', and 'if emplyoess get chance to do work in Japan they leran culture'. These persistent errors cause noticeable difficulty for the reader and mean that error-free sentences are rare, aligning the grammar with the Band 4.0 descriptors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.