Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

Nowadays, many large international companies offer their staff opportunity to spend a period of time living amd w countryorking in another country. this opportunity might be good for every employee I totaly agreed with this statement. The big advantage of this opportunnity is the employee will improve their communication skills and enhanc their carrer growth , this development also help the company carrer too beacuse employee meet different people sourounding their for mature development and excelent lives. Moreover , every person want to achive their goals of life so this is best time to explore the whol world or improve their skills as company employee. For example look at the our national young IT specialist Irfa karem she nominated by the government behalf of her computer skills . before her international achivement she was just a student in a company and company director decide to send her to abroad for higer education in copmuter skills , and the results is that everyone knows that how's she famous in pakistan and UK,but unfourtonality she died early in their young age . sadly but we a positive message from her always try to work hard to achieve your goals so that if your company send to abroad for your carree growth you have to go must dont miss this chance.one day you will gwt more and benefits in future. To sumup,as good employee take adop any opportunity from company and say wecome to new chapter in your life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt by discussing why international secondments are beneficial for employees and the resulting advantages for companies. However, the ideas are underdeveloped and lack sufficient support. Furthermore, the response falls short of the minimum word count requirement, containing only 246 words instead of the required 250, which impacts the overall fullness of the task response. While the student attempts to present a position and includes an example regarding an IT specialist, the narrative becomes distracted by personal anecdotes and tragedy rather than focusing strictly on the economic and professional arguments expected in an IELTS General Training Task 2. Consequently, the score reflects limited development and a minor penalisation for failing to meet the length requirement.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 4.5

The essay demonstrates some basic organisation, opening with an introductory statement and concluding with a brief summary phrase. However, the overall progression is heavily disrupted by poor paragraphing, massive run-on blocks, and a lack of logical transitions between sentences. Cohesive devices are used awkwardly or inaccurately, such as the sudden shift introduced by 'Moreover' and 'For example'. The personal story about the IT specialist is weakly connected to the main thesis, and referencing is frequently unclear, leaving the reader to decipher pronoun links. Paragraphing is not used effectively to separate distinct arguments, which significantly hinders the structural flow of the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive, struggling to meet the demands of the task. While the student attempts some less common terms like 'enhanc', 'sourounding', and 'achivement', these are marred by persistent spelling errors. Words are frequently misused, such as 'carrer carrer' and 'copmuter', which points to a limited and unstable lexical range. Although the general meaning can sometimes be extracted, the sheer frequency of lexical errors and poor word choice places this response firmly in the lower band categories.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.5

Grammatical control is weak throughout the response. The text relies heavily on simple sentence forms, and attempts at complex structures frequently result in faulty syntax, run-on sentences, and severe punctuation errors (e.g., missing capitalisation at the start of sentences, stray spaces before punctuation marks). There are numerous agreement and tense issues, such as 'employee will improve', 'company director decide', and 'company send to abroad'. These frequent errors cause considerable difficulty for the reader and obscure the intended meaning in multiple places.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.