Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In a globalized world, many large multinational companies offers their employees the chance to work abroad for a specific period of time. This increasing trends will help both individuals and the organization that employ.

For employees, working in a different countries will give a chance to expose them to learn multi cultural skills. It would help to develop more professional skills. Individual have chance to learn their work culture, safety standards and more important is language. When individuals return back from internation visit, they will give presentation about their working standards which eventually improve company work culture and standards.

For companies, sending employees to abroad will give key stratagic benifits. it will improve safety standard, working style. Employees returning back from abroad bring fresh ideas, operational techniques and better cross cultural understanding, which improves collobroation between international offices.

In conclusion, allowing staff to live and work abroad creates a clear win-win scenario. Workers gain essential career experience and personal development. Many large multinational companies offers their employees the chance to work abroad for a specific period of time. This increasing trends will help both individuals and the organization that employ.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response attempts to address all parts of the prompt, discussing both employee benefits and company advantages, and includes a clear concluding stance. However, the ideas are relatively brief, under-developed, and repetitive, particularly with the conclusion essentially repeating the second sentence of the introduction almost word-for-word. More importantly, the essay suffers significantly from length under-development, containing only 190 words against the required 250-word minimum. This major negative point restricts the overall development and places the response firmly within the lower-mid band categories. Consequently, Task Achievement is penalised for falling well short of the word count requirement.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay is divided into four short paragraphs, showing a basic attempt at paragraphing with an introduction, two body paragraphs covering the prompt's two questions, and a conclusion. However, the logical progression is weak. Paragraph transitions feel abrupt, and cohesive devices are limited and sometimes misused, such as the sudden lowercase start and lack of connection in 'it will improve safety standard'. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, as seen in phrases like 'learn their work culture' where the pronoun antecedent is ambiguous. Overall cohesion is mechanical and rudimentary, resulting in a score that reflects basic organizational attempts but lacks smooth progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student demonstrates a minimally adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully using terms like 'globalized', 'multinational', 'operational techniques', and 'cross cultural understanding'. However, there are frequent word-choice errors, incorrect forms, and spelling/typographical mistakes throughout the text. Examples include 'offers' instead of 'offer' in agreement with plural subjects, 'increasing trends', 'different countries' following 'a', 'internation visit', 'stratagic', 'benifits', and 'collobroation'. These lexical and spelling inaccuracies are noticeable and occasionally cause slight strain for the reader, fitting the descriptors for a band 5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, such as 'When individuals return back from internation visit, they will give presentation...' and 'allowing staff to live and work abroad creates a clear win-win scenario.' However, basic grammatical control is weak, with frequent errors in subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'companies offers', 'organization that employ'), missing plural markers, awkward phrasing ('expose them to learn'), and redundant expressions like 'return back'. While the meaning remains mostly clear despite these frequent errors, the high density of basic grammatical slips prevents the response from achieving a higher score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.