Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Most of international companies give the chance to their employees to live and work in another country for some period of time.Which hold the multiple advantages for not only the employees but also for companies as well.

First and formost,when worker get the chamce to work in another country they can build the international experience,which will be help to employees to grow more and employees can learn new ways of working.The employees will learn how to bring the new ideas and useful knowledge back to the company.For example,there are a lot of big companies who send their worker to diffrent countires such as Canada and America .

Moreover,I believe that people who get this opportunity ,employees may understand foreign customers and their need which will help to work on that area where companies might be not aware about it.This is also help to build the good reletionship with the international companies.These are the most important development for the companies When that person come back to the companies they will teach other employess too.How they can develop their skills , which skill will more help to grow world wide. For example , Amazon is the most famous company in the entire word, the start in USA but now it is popular every single village and twon, they work accrdingly their people need.

In Conclusion, working in another countries will get the advantages not only for employees but for the companies too.working in another country can be highly beneficial for employees because it helps them gain valuable experience, develop new skills and understand different cultures. At the same time, companies can benefit from employees who bring new knowledge, ideas and international experience back to the workplace.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both why international work opportunities benefit employees and what advantages they offer to companies. The student attempts to develop ideas, such as employees building international experience, bringing new ideas back, and helping companies understand foreign customers. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat repetitive and lacks depth, leaning on general statements rather than fully extended arguments or concrete personal examples. For instance, mentioning Amazon is relevant, but the explanation remains underdeveloped. According to the band descriptors, the response covers all parts of the task though some areas remain under-developed, aligning closely with a Band 6.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is an overall logical arrangement to the text, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a clear conclusion. Paragraphing is attempted, though formatting spacing is sometimes irregular. Cohesive devices are used to signal progression, such as 'First and formost', 'Moreover', and 'In Conclusion'. However, referencing and cohesion are frequently faulty or mechanical. For example, sentences often run together without proper punctuation or conjunctions (e.g., 'country for some period of time.Which hold...'). Additionally, pronoun referencing can be vague. These issues place the response firmly in Band 5.0, where organisation is present but cohesive devices and transitions are noticeably inaccurate or inadequate.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully incorporating terms like 'international experience', 'foreign customers', and 'beneficial'. There are numerous spelling, word choice, and word boundary errors throughout the text, such as 'formost' instead of 'foremost', 'chamce' instead of 'chance', 'diffrent' instead of 'different', and 'accrdingly' instead of 'accordingly'. These vocabulary and spelling errors do not completely impede communication, but they are noticeable and cause some difficulty for the reader. This performance reflects the criteria for Band 5.0, displaying a limited vocabulary range with noticeable errors in spelling and word formation.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, such as 'I believe that people who get this opportunity, employees may understand foreign customers...' However, control over grammar and punctuation is weak. There are frequent punctuation errors, missing spaces after commas and periods, and comma splices (e.g., 'opportunity for companies When that person...'). Grammatical structures are often faulty when attempting complex sentences, leading to frequent errors that cause strain for the reader. This matches the Band 5 descriptor where a limited range of structures is used and frequent errors occur, although meaning can still generally be deciphered.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.