Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.
Why might this opportunity be good for employees?
What advantages does this development have for companies?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
Most of the big companies provide their workers a chance to travel abroad these days. I firmly believe that it is a positive for both the organization and the employees as it helps them to create a strong bond with each other.
Exploring the world is the most common desire among everyone. Travelling on our own expensive always makes it difficult. People usually get strucked in a job to home cycle and apprently never get an ocassion to plan a vacation outside the country. But if companies sponsor their employees, it makes dream come true for some of them, specially the fact that they are not loosing their job. They do not have to spend from their pocket. I used to work for an employer, last year and we were given a tour of Australia for 2 weeks. When literally came back as different people because of the experiance we had there. Now everyone is working hard because they know that there is still much more to achieve.
Apart from the employees, the companies also have some positive impacts as a result. The major one is that the workers work hard if they are happy with the company. They can help the organization achieve their goals easily. Morover, Companies will have their loyal and trusted employees. They will not have to hire new staffs and their workload can be minimized by a positive environment among both of them. In my case, our company was doing better on records every year by the same staff after they started organizing these trips.
To sum up, providing a chance to work and travel at the same time brings a chance to explore the beautiful world for the workers and at the same time it is profitable for the owners.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both why the opportunity is good for employees and what advantages it brings to companies, supporting these points with a personal example. The student adopts a clear position throughout, stating that it is a positive development for both parties. The ideas are extended and supported, though some arguments tend to generalise slightly, such as stating that travelling on one's own is always expensive or that employees always work harder. Overall, the main parts of the prompt are well-covered with relevant ideas, earning a solid Band 6.5 to 7.0 for task achievement, comfortably sitting at a Band 7.0 due to the clear position and relevant extended examples.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response features a clear overall progression and logical organisation throughout, divided into an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a brief conclusion. Cohesive devices are used adequately to connect ideas, such as 'Apart from the employees', 'The major one', and 'To sum up'. However, paragraphing could be slightly more refined, and some transitional links feel a bit mechanical or repetitive. Referencing is generally clear, though occasional shifts in pronouns (such as moving between 'they', 'our', and 'we' in the personal example) slightly muddy the logical flow. Overall, the organisational structure is clear and logical, demonstrating the characteristics of a Band 6.5 to 7.0, with a score of 6.5 being most appropriate due to minor cohesion flaws.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common lexical items such as 'organization', 'sponsor', 'experience', and 'profitable'. However, there are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors that occasionally detract from precision, such as 'expensive' used as a noun phrase ('Travelling on our own expensive'), 'strucked' instead of 'stuck', 'apprently' instead of 'apparently', 'ocassion', and 'loosing' instead of 'losing'. Despite these inaccuracies, communication is never impeded, and the vocabulary is sufficient to convey the intended meaning. This performance fits the Band 6 descriptor well, as it displays an adequate range with some spelling and word-choice slips.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating conditional structures like 'if companies sponsor their employees, it makes dream come true'. However, there are frequent grammatical errors and awkward phrasing, such as 'Most of the big companies provide their workers a chance' (missing preposition), 'makes dream come true' (missing article), 'When literally came back' (missing subject pronoun), and issues with verb forms and tense consistency. While these errors do not severely impede communication, they persist throughout the text and prevent the grammar from reaching a Band 7 level. The control of grammar is characteristic of Band 6, featuring a mix of structures alongside noticeable errors.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.