Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.
Why might this opportunity be good for employees?
What advantages does this development have for companies?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Nowadays many lare ineternational companies offer to their employees to work opporutunity in another country and live to there perticular time period.This opportunity is beneficial for both company and employees, it provide there professional skills and experience in different country's culture and professional enviroment.
One major advantage for employee that is they learn new skill and global market in different diversity and other kind of professional skill like which technology they use and apply how's they work in different perspectives its significanntly for employee and their company home. other major beneficial for employee for learn some new strategies and apply there home company for like some language learn and use other foreign market compsnies for expand there business.
Another major advantage is there are major role to expand their market for company growth and their bussinessn create new ideas and knowledge about how to use new strategies or new product services to apply for company home. They learn how tackle new different diversity or environment and how to communicate and engaged other people in professional way. For intance, employees who ever work in japan so they learn language and they use in other bussiness etiquette, like share market and global marketing and use for there home company growth.
In conclusion,there is chance to working in another country its every people have dream nowadays so there is good opportunity for emplyees and there home companey also. Therefore its beneficial to learn new knowledge and idea,skill like foreign market how to work and expand there home company growth.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response addresses all parts of the task, discussing both why the opportunity is good for employees and what advantages it brings to companies. The student includes some relevant examples, such as employees working in Japan and learning language skills and business etiquette. However, the development of ideas is limited, and some points are repetitive and under-developed, particularly regarding company strategies. While the position is generally clear, the reasoning often lacks depth and clarity due to expression issues. This places the response in Band 5.0, as it addresses the task only partially with limited and under-developed ideas.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The text is organized into paragraphs with an attempt at an introduction and conclusion, showing some basic structure. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression, and the logical flow is frequently disrupted by poor referencing and inadequate cohesive devices. For instance, phrases like 'other major beneficial for employee' and 'Another major advantage is there are major role' create confusion rather than smooth transitions. Paragraphing is present, but internal cohesion is faulty and repetitive. Consequently, this performance fits the Band 5.0 descriptor for coherence and cohesion.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive, with numerous spelling and word-choice errors that strain the reader. Examples include 'lare' for large, 'opporutunity', 'enviroment', 'significanntly', and 'bussinessn'. The student attempts some less common vocabulary such as 'diversity', 'strategies', and 'etiquette', but these are often used inaccurately or ungrammatically, as seen in phrases like 'other kind of professional skill like which technology they use and apply how's they work'. The range is limited and minimally adequate, resulting in a Band 5.0 score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response exhibits a very limited range of structures, with frequent basic grammatical errors and poorly constructed sentences. There are major issues with subject-verb agreement, tense consistency, and missing prepositions, such as in 'employees who ever work in japan so they learn language and they use in other bussiness etiquette'. Attempts at complex sentences are almost always faulty, leading to numerous errors that cause significant difficulty and confusion for the reader. This performance aligns closely with the Band 4.0 or 5.0 descriptors; however, because communication is achieved despite frequent errors, a Band 5.0 is awarded.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.