Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Needless to say, numoures multi-national organizations provide oppotunities for their employees to spare time in distint countries for residing and working. I beleive, this opotunities have positive impacts on the people and employees as a whole for their career developments.

Owing to above topic, while having an opportunities with working with any international organization, would help to provide a successful career boost. For instance, when an individual live in an abroad, he/she can also explore other career opprtunities in the same sectors; this may provide invasive growth in the desired career. In addition to that, by learning new skills and tactics from other employees, they can able to bring positive impact in the companies.

Furthermore, spending some time in another countries would help an employees to be more productive towards their work and balance their proffesional life. To ellaborate, being surrounded by different culture and traditions, an employees will be having more fun and enthusism to gain a profound knowledge from different aspects of life such as food, life-styles and their rituals while having some leisure time. Having this kind of refreshment from routine monotonous of the same country, they return to work with a more rechargeable energy along with some positive attitude towards their work life

To conclude, providing these kind of oppotunities are invariably fruitful for companies betterment while increasing growth of success in this competative era with the help of employee's positive energy and enthusiam towards the work.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response attempts to address all parts of the prompt, discussing both why the opportunity is good for employees and what advantages it brings to companies. However, the ideas are relatively superficial and under-developed due to insufficient elaboration and vocabulary limitations. Furthermore, the length requirement has not been met, as the response contains only 241 words against the mandatory 250-word minimum, which places a natural ceiling on the task achievement score. While a clear position is stated in the introduction, the supporting points remain basic and lack specific, well-reasoned examples, pulling the overall development down.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay is organized into four distinct paragraphs, including an introduction and conclusion. There is a basic overall progression of ideas, moving from employee benefits to company advantages. However, cohesive devices are often mechanical, inaccurate, or repetitive, as seen in phrases like 'Owing to above topic' and 'To ellaborate'. Paragraphing is present, but internal transitions feel forced and referencing is occasionally unclear. The mechanical and sometimes awkward use of cohesive tools prevents the essay from reaching a higher band score.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is limited and contains numerous severe spelling errors that impede understanding. Examples include 'numoures' instead of numerous, 'oppotunities' and 'opprtunities' instead of opportunities, 'distint' instead of distant, 'inovative' or similar intended words, and 'proffesional'. There are also awkward word choices and collocations, such as 'spare time in distint countries for residing' and 'routine monotonous'. While the writer attempts some less common vocabulary, the high frequency of basic spelling mistakes and imprecise lexical choices restricts the band score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but control over grammar is weak. There are frequent errors in subject-verb agreement and tense usage, such as 'this opotunities have', 'when an individual live in an abroad', 'they can able to bring', and 'an employees will be having'. Punctuation is also problematic in places, with comma splices and run-on structures. Although the meaning can generally be deciphered, the persistent grammatical inaccuracies across most sentences demonstrate a lack of solid control over complex forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.