Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

ctuation: 3

International travel has been developing in numerous workplaces those are working worldwide. It offers an opportunity to employees to discover a foreign culture and rejuvenate their spirits. However, international working trips boost companies performance, providing loyal employees to the company by offering job satisfaction to employees.

To begin with, workers feel refreshed and joyful when the company plan an international business trip for them. It kills their boredom from daily work. For example, it boosts their mood when they get an opportunity to explore another country free. Thus, working trips help them to explore another nation. Moreover, it improves their job satisfaction. If employees get something entertaining and profitable from the company, they feel satisfied with their personal requirements. Eventually, it enhances the mood and personal needs of employees.

Companies reaps numerous benefits in return for these trips such as more profits and loyal customers who wish to work in the company for a long time. Since the employees are fully satisfied with their job, they perform better in every task. As a result, company earns more outcome. Furthermore, employees also respect their employers for giving an opportunity to travel another country. Overall, company earns respect and loyalty of workers that play a crucial role in fulfilling future goals.

To conclude, international travel is beneficial for both employer and employees. Employees get perks to travel another country and a chance to explore different nations. On the other hand, employer got satisfied employees and surge in profits. As a result, it is a positive approach for all.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt, discussing why the opportunity is good for employees and the advantages it brings to companies. The writer has a clear stance throughout the essay. However, some ideas are repetitive and under-developed, particularly in the second body paragraph where the points regarding profits and loyalty are reiterated without deep extension. For instance, stating that companies reap benefits such as 'more profits and loyal customers' is slightly confused since the prompt refers to internal employees rather than external customers. While all requirements are covered, the depth of task response aligns best with Band 6 descriptors.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay is generally coherent with a clear overall progression. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the introduction, employee benefits, company benefits, and conclusion. Cohesive devices are employed, such as 'To begin with', 'Moreover', and 'To conclude', which guide the reader through the text. However, referencing is occasionally imprecise, such as the pronoun use in 'those are working worldwide' and some mechanical transitions. While the logical arrangement is clear, the occasional faulty referencing and repetitive mechanical links prevent a higher score, placing it firmly at Band 6.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, attempting some less common items such as 'rejuvenate', 'job satisfaction', and 'crucial role'. However, there are notable word-choice and collocation errors, such as 'company earns more outcome' instead of profit or revenue, and 'travel another country' omitting the preposition 'to'. The writer also confuses 'employers' and 'employees' in the conclusion ('employer got satisfied employees'), which impacts precision. The lexical range is sufficient for the basic communication of ideas, but the frequency of inaccuracies limits the score to Band 6.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, with attempts at conditional structures ('If employees get something entertaining...'). There are frequent grammatical errors and awkward phrasing, such as 'workplaces those are working', 'company plan an international business trip' (subject-verb agreement), and missing prepositions ('travel another country'). Punctuation and phrasing errors occasionally cause minor strain for the reader, though they do not completely impede communication. These frequent errors across a limited structural range place the grammar score at Band 5.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.