Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is an undeniable fact that in today worlds a number of international companies give a chance to workers to spend therir living and working time in another nation. This trend offers various benefits for workers to improve their knowledge and companies can improve their productiviety by learning new techniques from other country.

In the term of employees, there are numerous positive effects of living and working in other nation. Firstly. workers may get an opporunity to get familiar with new culture ,food and language.As a result, they may feel rejuvenated and excited while connecting with unknow things which help me improve their focus towards work and they may not feel dull and bore. For example, a survey was connected by USA company. 50% of staff had more experience of dealing with hard situation by grtting knowledge of world.

In term of company, company can improve their business to large extend by learning new ways of business form other nation. They can get a chance to improve their mistakes. Consequently, they can increase their productivity in upcoming days. They can also make good decision with other nation people regarding business which help them to escape from any lose.

To conclude, althogh staff can broden their horizon of knowledge regarding business situation and culture, company also extend their business by learning new ways of business.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both questions: you mention cultural and language exposure as benefits for employees, and learning new business methods and improving productivity as benefits for companies. However, these points are brief and sometimes unclear, so the response only partially develops the task. For example, the employee benefit that new experiences may improve focus is asserted but not explained, while the company section does not show clearly how learning from another country would lead to better decisions or fewer losses. The survey example is also vague and difficult to verify or connect to the main point. The response is 26 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to explain and support your ideas. Develop each benefit with a clear explanation and a specific, relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction is followed by separate paragraphs about employees and companies, then a conclusion. This makes the main direction easy to follow. You also use basic signposting such as “Firstly,” “As a result,” “Consequently,” and “To conclude.” However, some links are mechanical or unclear. In the employee paragraph, the move from cultural exposure to improved focus is not fully explained, and “which help me improve their focus” makes the reference difficult to follow. The conclusion repeats the main points rather than drawing them together. Use clearer links between each benefit and its result, and ensure pronouns refer unambiguously to the people or ideas intended.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “international companies,” “productivity,” “rejuvenated,” and “business,” and you attempt phrases such as “broaden their horizon.” However, the range is limited and several spelling, word-form, and collocation errors make parts of the response difficult to understand. Examples include “productiviety,” “opporunity,” “grtting,” and “escape from any lose”; “a survey was connected” is also an unnatural expression. Repetition of “business” and “other nation” limits precision. Build a bank of accurate topic phrases and check spelling and collocations carefully. For instance, describe a survey as “conducted” and say that a company can “avoid losses” rather than “escape from any lose.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a result clause beginning “As a result” and a sentence using “which.” However, the range is limited, and errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles, and punctuation occur often enough to affect clarity. For example, “in today worlds” lacks the possessive form, “in other nation” needs an appropriate article or plural, and “which help them” does not agree with its subject. The sentence beginning “Firstly.” is incorrectly punctuated, and the long sentence about new experiences contains an unclear clause structure. Practise building accurate sentences with one main idea and a clearly attached supporting clause, then check subject–verb agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.