Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Numerous international corporations offer their employees with an opportunity to stay and work in abroad for some time. I believe it is a great method to improve both employee's career graph and company's growth.

In this essay, I will discuss the advantages in the following paragraphs.

First of all, various multinational companies expanded all over the globe. From an employee's perspective, it would be a life time opportunity for them to go to another country for work. The main advantage is the upliftment of an individual's career growth and rise in living standards.For instance, many firms prefer foreign working experience, so it would increase the chance to get a reputative job profile and a high salary package compared to other workers. Moreover, it would also helps them geting promotions on the basis of their foreign experience.

However, it also benefits the firm itself. Being a multinational institution,the exposure and experience what an employee has gained from working in foreign country would definitely be an asset. For instance, if a worker or manager has updated skills whether it is manufacturing to sales, it would give an addtional benefit to know more about the latest advancement and demands and eventually enhance the working abiltiy to meet the demand of clients and attract the foreign investors to the respective company. It would results in the growth of the company.

Corporations who sends their staffs to work in another country would be beneficial for both company and employee. This is because it will professionally help individuals to built their strong career for themselves. On the other hand,having skilled and well trained workers would increase the chances of rise in growth of company due to their abroad's exposure and expriences would help

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both questions and maintains a clear overall view: overseas assignments can support employees’ careers and benefit company growth. The employee section gives relevant points about career prospects, salary and promotion, while the company section links international experience to updated skills, understanding client demand and attracting investors. These examples show a relevant response to the task. However, some ideas are asserted rather than fully explained: for example, the link between foreign experience and a “reputative job profile” is unclear, and the company benefits are crowded together without showing how each would arise. The conclusion also repeats the main claims rather than adding a clear final synthesis. Develop the cause-and-effect reasoning and make each example more specific.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for employee and company benefits, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “First of all,” “For instance,” and “Moreover” help readers follow the main points. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to track, particularly in the long company-benefit sentence beginning “if a worker or manager has updated skills.” Several ideas are joined together without clear boundaries, and the final sentence trails off, leaving the conclusion incomplete. Some linking is also mechanical, with repeated “For instance” and “This is because.” Use shorter, clearly focused sentences, make references such as “it” and “this” unambiguous, and ensure the conclusion completes its final point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses a reasonable range of topic-related vocabulary, including “multinational companies,” “living standards,” “foreign working experience,” “latest advancement,” and “foreign investors.” These choices show an effort to discuss careers and international business rather than relying only on basic terms. However, several expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, which limits precision: “career graph,” “reputative job profile,” and “additional benefit to know more” do not convey the intended meanings naturally. There are also spelling errors such as “addtional,” “abiltiy,” and “expriences,” alongside awkward repetition of “growth.” Choose established collocations and check spelling; for example, describe career development as “career progression” and a company’s gains as “competitive advantages.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

There is an attempt to use both simple and complex structures, including a conditional example (“if a worker or manager…”) and a reason clause (“This is because…”). The main ideas are generally understandable, but grammatical control is uneven, and errors sometimes make relationships between ideas hard to follow. Examples include “offer their employees with an opportunity,” “it would also helps,” “Corporations who sends,” and “it would results,” which show problems with verb patterns, agreement and verb forms. The final sentence also lacks a complete grammatical ending. Improve accuracy by checking subject–verb agreement and keeping verb forms consistent, and divide long sentences into manageable clauses. More reliable control of these structures would make the argument clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.