Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

In these days, number of overseas companies offering a opportunity to their employees to living and work in different countries. This might be better option for staff. In this eassy, i will discuss some benefits for the companies.

To begin with, mostly companies offering this for their development. For example, if their workers will work in another country they can learn and adapt their skills. Also, they can learn about their working methods. In addition, every comany has own rules and regulations for company's economic growth.

Moreover, it is good option for workers too, they can change their living standard and how to represent theirselves in meeting. Large companies working with multinational sectors, in that they have meetings with CEO'S. However, mostly employees just get their experience from big companies and they try to build their own company.

In conclusion, big companies give chance to their staff to work in differnt company and they want to apply on their company and improve a better environment.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response makes a relevant attempt to discuss benefits for both employees and companies, mentioning that workers may learn new skills and working methods and that companies may support their economic growth. However, the task is addressed only partially: the employee benefits are vague, and the company advantages are not clearly explained or supported with a specific example. The point that employees might use their experience to start their own company is introduced but not connected to a clear benefit for their employer. The conclusion also does not summarise the two sides accurately. The response is 85 words below the required minimum, which leaves too little space to develop the ideas. Explain each advantage and add a relevant example for both questions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is a basic paragraph structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “Moreover” and “In conclusion” help show the intended sequence. However, progression between ideas is not consistently clear. The first body paragraph shifts from staff learning to company rules without explaining the connection, while the second moves from employees’ living standards to meetings with CEOs and then to starting a business. Some linking is also awkward, as in “Large companies working with multinational sectors, in that…”. Develop one main point at a time, use clearer references to connect sentences, and ensure the conclusion follows logically from the discussion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response uses a small but relevant set of topic vocabulary, including “employees,” “working methods,” “economic growth” and “multinational sectors.” These terms show an attempt to discuss international business and workplace development. However, the range is limited, and several word choices or collocations make ideas unclear, such as “better option for staff,” “change their living standard” and “apply on their company.” Spelling errors, including “eassy,” “comany” and “differnt,” are noticeable and reduce accuracy. Build a more precise vocabulary for benefits such as professional development, cross-cultural understanding and knowledge transfer, and check spelling and natural word combinations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response mainly relies on simple sentence patterns, with a few attempts to join ideas using “if,” “also” and “in addition.” Some meaning remains understandable, but frequent errors in sentence construction and verb forms make parts difficult to follow. For example, “offering a opportunity to their employees to living and work” has problems with articles and the verb pattern, while “if their workers will work” uses an unsuitable tense after “if.” The sentence beginning “Moreover, it is good option for workers too” also joins separate ideas with a comma. Practise accurate basic clauses first, then add controlled complex sentences; check articles, verb forms, agreement and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.