Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays many large international companies offer their staff the opportunity to spend a period of time living and working in another country.

Why might this opportunity be good for employees?

What advantages does this development have for companies?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In today's world, large international companies provides several chances to their employers to spend time in living and working in foreign country . For staff this might be very amzing oppourtunity because workers will get to know about more about the working enviornment when they will intereact with other foreign companies . Staff learns many things regarding how different is the rules and regulations are there and also they will become self dependent because in another country there will no one to take care of them . They need to do most of the things alone from doing work to making food . That will be very useful for them as their personal growth. On the other side , for companies sending staff to another country is very development method for their own company as it result to know about the changes that companies could make after getting ides from the staff . They gives many methods after learning from foreign comapnies and implement in their own company to gain more profit . secondly, by providing chances to their employess companies get more staff because people like to invest their time into that things that make their future which assits the company to gain more workers to enhance their company in the econmy

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both questions and give relevant reasons: employees may learn about different working practices and become more independent, while companies may adopt ideas from overseas and attract staff. However, these points are brief and sometimes unclear. For example, “they will become self dependent” is not explained with a specific workplace benefit, and the claim that opportunities help companies “get more staff” needs clearer reasoning. The response therefore only partially develops the task. It also contains 213 words, so it does not meet the required minimum of 250. Develop each main idea with an explanation or a relevant example, and make the link between the opportunity and each benefit explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some organisation: the response first discusses benefits for employees and then turns to companies with “On the other side.” This helps the reader identify the two parts of the task. However, the ideas within each section are not consistently sequenced or connected, and the response has no clear paragraph breaks to separate its main points. Linking phrases such as “also” and “secondly” are used, but they do not always show how one idea follows from another. For instance, the move from learning about foreign rules to doing household tasks is abrupt. Use separate paragraphs for employee and company benefits, then connect each explanation to its main point with clear referencing and transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “working environment,” “rules and regulations,” “personal growth,” and “gain more profit.” This gives you enough language to communicate the general subject. However, the range is limited, and several spelling errors or imprecise expressions make parts difficult to understand, such as “amzing oppourtunity,” “enviornment,” and “ides.” Some combinations are also unnatural, including “spend time in living” and “development method.” Aim to use more precise workplace vocabulary and check spelling carefully. For example, “work overseas” is more natural than “spend time in living,” while “a valuable opportunity” is clearer than “amzing oppourtunity.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts to combine ideas using clauses with “because,” “when,” and “as,” but the range of sentence structures is limited and errors occur frequently. Subject–verb agreement is inaccurate in “companies provides” and “They gives,” while article and plural forms are missing or incorrect in “in foreign country” and “how different is the rules.” Several sentences also have faulty construction, such as “there will no one to take care of them,” which makes the intended meaning less clear. Punctuation spacing is inconsistent, and some long sentences would be easier to follow if divided. Practise accurate simple sentences first, then build longer sentences while checking agreement, articles, and clause order.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.