Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

All new employees at your workplace have a mentor - an experienced colleague who gives them advice and support in their career. As a new employee, you have been given details of your mentor.

Write a letter to introduce yourself to your new mentor. In your letter

• give a brief outline of your previous studies and work experience

• explain what help you hope your mentor can give

• suggest arrangements for a first meeting with your mentor

You do NOT need to write any addresses.

Begin your letter as follows:

Dear....... ,

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Dear Karen,

I am writing this letter in order to request about seeking your proficient guidence for my further career development.

As you know little bit about my professional background, I have completed my bachlor degree in the field of Orthotics and prosthetics, I enrolled myself in healthcare leadership program in Canada. I started work as a medical admin assistant and now, I have been working as a patient service associate in our clinic since a year.

Needless to say, you have profound amount of knowledge about healthcare background; your expertise and vast experience in the same field would not only help me to provide unique ideas, but also boost my confidence if I have required to take further steps to reach on next position.

Therefore, I would like to set up a quick chat whenever you have time from your busy schedule. Looking forward to hearing a positive revort from your side.

Best regards,

Reena

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response successfully covers all three bullet points outlined in the task instructions. Reena starts by introducing herself to her mentor, Karen, and gives a brief outline of her previous studies and current work experience, noting her bachelor's degree in Orthotics and Prosthetics and her current role as a patient service associate. She then explains what help she hopes to receive, specifically mentioning career development and gaining confidence for future progression. Finally, she suggests arrangements for a first meeting by proposing a quick chat at Karen's convenience. The tone is appropriately formal and polite for a workplace correspondence. All parts of the prompt are fully addressed, warranting a solid band score for this criterion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The letter exhibits a clear logical organisation and progression from the opening salutation through background details and expectations to the final meeting proposal and sign-off. Paragraphing is used appropriately, with each paragraph focusing on a distinct theme such as introduction, professional background, mentoring goals, and closing arrangements. Cohesive devices are generally used well, for instance, using 'Therefore' and 'Needless to say' to link ideas, although some phrasing is slightly awkward. Overall referencing is clear, and the structure guides the reader naturally through the letter.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

Reena demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary appropriate for a professional context, using terms like 'proficient guidance', 'career development', and 'healthcare leadership program'. There are, however, some noticeable vocabulary and spelling errors, such as 'guidence' instead of guidance, 'bachlor' instead of bachelor, and 'revort' instead of report. Additionally, some collocations are slightly unnatural, such as 'request about seeking' or 'profound amount of knowledge'. Despite these occasional inaccuracies that prevent a higher score, the vocabulary is adequate to convey the intended meaning clearly without impeding communication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, such as conditional and relative clauses ('...if I have required to take further steps...'). There are, however, several grammatical inaccuracies and awkward phrasings throughout the text. For instance, 'request about seeking' is grammatically redundant, 'little bit about' is too informal, and 'if I have required' should be passive ('if I am required'). Punctuation is generally fine, but the grammatical errors occasionally distract the reader, placing the response firmly within the Band 6 descriptor range where errors persist in complex forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.