Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Doctors tell us that we can get all the vitamins we need from having a healthy diet. Despite this advice, some people continue to spend large sums of money on vitamin pills.

Why do you think some people spend a lot of money on vitamin pills?

How could people be persuaded to improve their diet instead of buying vitamin pills?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Although several doctors claim that all the necessary nutrients can be acquired from eating a healthy diet, still some people choose to spend a considerable amount of money on multivitamins. I believe continous consumption of vitamin pills fecilitates in fulfilment of nutrients demand in human body. However, healthy eating habits can be pursuaded to the public by some measures taken by the government.

There are several reasons to take vitamin pills regularly. One os the compelling reasons is the insurance mindset. By intaking supplements everyday people feel secured because they feel by completing the required percentage of vitamins in their body they will be secure from several diseases. This was evident during COVID-19 when the sales for vitamin C and D rose significantly. Additionally, there are some people such as pregnant women, elderly people and those having absorption problems who genuuinely need the supplements to overcome vitamin deficiency. Moreover, modern society also contribute to the use of supplements in human diet. Fitness influencers and gym culture demonstrate vitamin pills as an important part of the healthy lifestyle.

Conversely, the authorities can run compaigns and advertisements to create awarness among the public. The government can hire reowned personalities to influence normal people to consume more healthy food instead of vitamin pills. Furthermore, the government should also provide the public with honest information about risks associated with overdose of vitamins. For instance, not only excessive nutrients in the body can damage some organs but also can intract with medicines which can have severe results. Consequently, it is essential to take multivitamins only upon doctor's prescription.

In conclusion, sometimes taking supplements are essential to maintain the nutrients balance in the body. Nevertheless, the compaigns by the government can motivate the citizens to adopt healthy eating food rather than depending on supplements. From my perspective, the conteporary world consider vitamin pills as a healthy lifestyle whereas it should not be taken without prescription from a specialist

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.0
Coherence and Cohesion7.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response addresses both questions and maintains a clear overall position: people buy supplements for reassurance, specific health needs, and influence from fitness culture, while public campaigns and information are proposed as alternatives. The COVID-19 example supports the reassurance point, and the discussion of pregnant women and older people adds relevant qualification. The proposed measures are also pertinent, especially explaining risks of excessive intake. To strengthen the response further, develop the less-supported ideas: explain more specifically how campaigns or trusted public figures could change everyday food choices, and clarify that supplements may be appropriate for some people while a balanced diet is generally preferable for others. This would make the reasoning more consistently extended and precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear four-paragraph structure, with separate sections for reasons, solutions, and a conclusion. Its progression is easy to follow, and signposts such as “Additionally,” “Moreover,” and “Conversely” help show how points relate. The examples are generally placed alongside the ideas they support. Some linking is a little mechanical, however, and the conclusion largely repeats the earlier position rather than drawing the two parts together. The phrase “not only … but also” is also awkwardly arranged, which briefly disrupts the flow. For stronger cohesion, use a wider range of natural transitions and make links between claims explicit—for example, connect public information about risks to the recommendation to seek medical advice.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

There is an adequate range of vocabulary for discussing health and public influence, including “absorption problems,” “vitamin deficiency,” “overdose,” and “healthy lifestyle.” Some less common expressions are attempted, but inaccurate word choice, collocation, and spelling reduce precision. Examples include “insurance mindset” where “sense of security” would be more natural, “intaking supplements,” and “healthy eating food.” Several spelling errors—such as “continous,” “awarness,” and “reowned”—also affect the overall control of vocabulary, although the meaning remains understandable. Aim to learn common word partnerships and check spelling carefully. More precise phrasing would help the ideas sound natural and appropriately formal.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The response uses a mix of simple and complex structures, including a relative clause in “those having absorption problems who genuinely need the supplements” and a contrast introduced by “Although.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “some people choose … still” has awkward clause structure, “modern society also contribute” has subject–verb disagreement, and “sometimes taking supplements are essential” has disagreement between the gerund subject and verb. The final sentence also lacks a clear, complete structure after “whereas.” Work on agreement, clause construction, and sentence boundaries, while retaining the variety of sentence forms already attempted. These corrections would make the argument more consistently controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.