Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-08-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given maps illustrates information about road access to city hospital in 2007 and 2010.

To commence with, The city hospital in year 2007 , hospital was in the north direction and in around of the hospital the ring road was made. In front of the hospital in right side thee was place for car parking where staff and public both can park there vehicle. Moreover in the East there was a bus stop and to reach the hospital there is a four-way. However, the road has been constructed. In year 2010 some changes has been made, parking for staff and public have been separated so no-one have to face any kind of difficulty. The bus station is now just in-front of the hospital so patients do not have to travel from far. the round about has been constructed so it will be easy for vehicles to move on the four way road.

To conclude, there are only few changes have been made such as parking , round about and bus station for patients and staff.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response covers the main features of the maps, such as the changes to parking, the bus station, and the road infrastructure. However, the description lacks precision in spatial referencing. For example, stating the hospital was 'in the north direction' is vague, and the description of the 'four-way' road is unclear. While the main trends are identified, the comparison between 2007 and 2010 could be more analytical. The response would benefit from a clearer overview statement that highlights the most significant changes, such as the improved accessibility and the separation of parking facilities, rather than just listing features.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The response is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the progression from 2007 to 2010. However, the use of cohesive devices is somewhat mechanical and occasionally misused, such as 'To commence with' and 'However, the road has been constructed', which does not logically connect to the previous sentence. The referencing is sometimes unclear, particularly when describing the location of features. The flow between sentences is often disjointed, making the overall structure feel a bit repetitive and lacking in sophisticated linking.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision required for a higher band. There are several instances of awkward phrasing, such as 'in around of the hospital' and 'thee was place for car parking'. The student relies on basic terminology and struggles with collocations related to map description, such as 'four-way' instead of 'roundabout' or 'intersection'. While the meaning is generally clear, the lack of variety and the presence of word-choice errors limit the score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response contains frequent grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues ('The given maps illustrates', 'some changes has been made') and article misuse ('in the north direction', 'the round about'). Sentence structures are mostly simple, and attempts at more complex sentences often result in errors, such as 'parking for staff and public have been separated so no-one have to face any kind of difficulty'. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma placement. These errors are noticeable and occasionally distract the reader, though they do not completely impede communication.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.