Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-17
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The map illustrates information about road access yo the city hospital between 2007 and 2010.
Overall, the hospital routes are more developed and functional in 2010 as compared to 2007. Like new staff parking, city road circle and public car parking near hospital.
In 2007, the car parking and staff parking both are together near to hospital road by passing from city road. Also, there are six bus stops were mentioned on the hospital road, near the parking.
In 2010, the parking areas was separated: public car parking is build near the city hospital at east side. Whereas, the staff car parking is still near the hospital road on the right side. The bus station is located on the left side of hospital road near city hospital, to passing from city road and took roundabout on left side , the bus station were there. In the end the city hospital and roads were more developed in 2010, as before.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response successfully covers the main features of the two maps, highlighting the key changes between 2007 and 2009/2010. The overview adequately captures the general trend that the hospital routes became more developed, pointing out new facilities such as the separate staff and public car parks, roundabouts, and the bus station. However, some details are slightly inaccurate or confusingly expressed, such as the description of the bus station location and its access routes. The response selects and reports relevant data overall, meeting the core requirements of Task 1, but the lack of precision in describing spatial relationships limits it to a Band 6.0.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The text is organized into an introduction, an overview paragraph, and body paragraphs detailing the specific features of 2007 and 2010. Logical progression is attempted, but cohesion is sometimes faulty or mechanical. For example, transition phrases like 'In the end' are awkward, and referencing within sentences (such as 'to passing from city road and took roundabout on left side') lacks clarity and smooth flow. Paragraphing is present and generally separates the distinct time periods, but overall the cohesive ties are strained, warranting a Band 5.5.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, attempting some less common items related to maps and transport infrastructure, such as 'roundabout', 'car parking', and 'developed'. However, there are notable word choice errors and unnatural collocations, such as 'staff parking both are together', 'city road circle', and 'parking areas was separated'. Spelling mistakes also appear, such as 'yo' instead of 'to'. The lexical range is minimally sufficient to convey the main points, but errors in word formation and precision restrict the score to a Band 5.5.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but grammatical accuracy is quite weak throughout. There are frequent errors in verb tenses, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions, such as 'the parking areas was separated', 'public car parking is build', and 'six bus stops were mentioned'. Run-on sentences and awkward phrasing, like 'to passing from city road and took roundabout on left side , the bus station were there', significantly disrupt the grammatical flow. These persistent errors place the grammar score at a Band 5.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
