Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The given map compares the infrastructure of city hospital road between 2007 and 2010.

Overall, it can be seen that there were many new changes was come in 3 years and a number of roundbouts added.

Looking at the map in more details. Firstly, ring road was in the north side of city hospital and facility of car parking for staff and public in the south-east. Furthermore, bus stop was located in east far from hospital.

Moreover, there was many new changes come in infrastructres of city hospital roads, first of all, new car park made in east only for public and ring road was at the same place as 2007. Furthermore, one big roundbout was made in south and it connected to another roundbout and bus station which was moved from east to the opposite side of previous car park. In addition, previous car parking shifted into only for staff.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The student attempts to cover the main features of the two maps comparing the layout of the city hospital in 2007 and 2010. Some key developments are identified, such as the introduction of roundabouts, the relocation of the bus station, and the separation of staff and public car parks. However, the overview is extremely basic and lacks precision in describing spatial relationships. For instance, stating that the bus stop was located 'in east far from hospital' is inaccurate compared to the source map, which shows multiple individual bus stops along Hospital Road. Furthermore, the description of the new public car park and roundabouts is somewhat confusing and lacks full development, resulting in a Band 5 performance for this criterion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response is divided into four very short paragraphs, showing an attempt at structural organisation. However, the logical progression is weak. The transition phrases used, such as 'Looking at the map in more details. Firstly...' and 'Moreover...', are disjointed and create a choppy flow. Paragraphing is poorly handled, as the body paragraphs consist of single, fragmented sentences. Furthermore, cohesive devices are used clumsily or inaccurately, and the referencing between pronouns and entities is occasionally unclear, which corresponds to the Band 5 descriptor.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The lexical range is very limited and repetitive, relying on basic terms like 'map', 'hospital', 'road', and 'car park'. There are notable word choice and spelling errors throughout the text, such as 'roundbouts' instead of roundabouts, 'infrastructres' instead of infrastructures, and awkward phrasing like 'new changes was come'. The student struggles to use less common vocabulary accurately, and vocabulary limitations occasionally hinder clear communication, placing the response firmly at Band 5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The student uses a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying primarily on simple sentences and overly repetitive patterns connected by coordinating conjunctions. There are frequent and intrusive grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues ('changes was come') and missing articles or prepositions ('in north side', 'made in east'). Complex sentence structures are largely absent or heavily flawed. While the overall meaning can be partially discerned, the high frequency of basic errors limits the score to Band 5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.