Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-22
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The two maps shows road access to city hospital in 2007 and 2010. While in 2007 infrastructure wasn't build with structure, as you can see staff car park and public car park were jointly together. It would be difficult for the staff to park their car where public park the cars. But in 2010 infrastructure was developed and it separates the public car park and staff car park. Bus station was also developed in 2010 and it was near to the hospital so people can acess easily, while it was much away from the city hospital in 2007. In modern development roundabout was build it made the easy access to the staff car park and bus station and also to the city road.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You identify the two years and report several relevant changes, including the separation of staff and public parking and the introduction of a bus station and roundabouts. However, the account is partial and some details are inaccurate: the bus stops were beside Hospital Road in 2007, not “much away” from the hospital, and the 2010 public car park was on the east side of Ring Road, rather than simply a division of the original car park. The overview is also limited; it should summarise the main transformation in access arrangements. The response is 123 words, below the required 150, which restricts the detail you can provide. Describe the locations and connections more precisely and include the removal of the individual bus stops.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response follows a basic chronological comparison, moving from 2007 to 2010, and uses “While” and “But” to signal contrast. This gives the reader a general sense of the changes. However, the ideas are compressed into one paragraph and the progression is not always clear: the discussion shifts from parking to bus access and then to roundabouts without a distinct overview or organised grouping. Some links are also awkward, such as “while it was much away,” which makes the comparison difficult to follow. Use a short introduction and overview, then group the parking changes separately from the road and bus changes. Clearer linking phrases such as “By 2010” and “In addition” would make the sequence easier to track.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “infrastructure,” “car park,” “bus station,” “roundabout,” and “access,” so the main subject is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several choices are imprecise or unnatural, such as “infrastructure wasn't build with structure,” “public park the cars,” and “made the easy access.” The spelling error “acess” also affects accuracy. These issues sometimes make the intended meaning less clear, particularly when describing how the facilities changed. Aim for precise map language and natural collocations, for example, “the car park was divided into separate staff and public facilities” and “roundabouts improved access.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt to connect ideas in longer sentences, for example with “While” and “so,” but the range of structures is limited and errors occur frequently. Subject–verb agreement is incorrect in “The two maps shows,” and past-tense forms are faulty in “wasn't build” and “roundabout was build.” The sentence beginning “While in 2007…” is also an incomplete or awkwardly constructed contrast, while “where public park the cars” lacks a clear grammatical structure. These errors can make relationships between ideas difficult to understand. Practise accurate past passive forms (“was built”), agreement (“the maps show”), and complete comparison sentences. Shorter, well-controlled sentences would help establish accuracy before adding more complex structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
