Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Speaking foreign language in a different country may lead to various issues such as social connectivity and practicality. To some extent, I agree with this viewpoint particularly if the local people is clueless about the language spoken.

It is not uncommon fact that there are nations who do not have the resources or the intention of learning the universal language - English. The gap of having a common ground in communication may cause restriction in understanding one another. For instance, when an English tourist visit a non-English speaking country, relaying concerns and asking for help from the locals may be challenging and stressful for both sides. Another thing worth considering as well is the high possiblity of getting scammed and tricked of paying too much as many people take advantage individuals whom they think do not have practical knowledge how things work locally. Hence, it is vital to consider language compatibility before visiting a foreign country.

Furthermore, visiting a place where residents widely speak and understand English will be a convenient way to get through daily and to socially connect with others. Let us take for an example the Philippines, it is not an English country but almost everyone understand and speak english well as it is included in the countrys's school curriculum. As a result, foreign visitors can travel and explore the country with ease.

In conclusion, being in a foreign country is challenging particularly when it comes to communication. Consequently, considering the language is as important as choosing the country.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree to some extent that language differences create social and practical difficulties. The examples about asking locals for help and the risk of being overcharged are relevant, and the Philippines example supports your point that English can make travel easier. This addresses the task, but the discussion is unevenly developed. The first body paragraph explains practical problems in some detail, while the social problem of forming relationships is only briefly mentioned through “socially connect with others.” The conclusion also repeats the general importance of language rather than clarifying the extent of your agreement. Develop the social consequences with a specific example and explain whether these difficulties are serious or manageable to make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs with distinct functions, and a conclusion. Ideas generally progress logically, and signposts such as “For instance,” “Furthermore,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. This meets the expected level of coherent organisation. Some connections, however, feel mechanical or imprecise. “Another thing worth considering as well” repeats the same linking function, while “Hence” introduces advice about choosing a destination rather than directly drawing together the preceding point. The second body paragraph shifts from language-related problems to the benefits of English-speaking destinations without fully linking that contrast to your stated partial agreement. Use fewer formulaic transitions and make the relationship between each example and your position more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “communication,” “common ground,” “take advantage,” and “language compatibility.” These choices help convey both practical and social concerns, and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more specific phrasing, although some combinations are inaccurate or unnatural: “social connectivity,” “restriction in understanding,” and “practical knowledge how things work locally” do not express the ideas as naturally as they could. Spelling and word-form slips such as “possiblity” and “english” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural collocations and check spelling and capitalization. For example, “social integration” and “difficulty understanding one another” would communicate your points more idiomatically.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional clause in “particularly if the local people is clueless” and a relative clause in “individuals whom they think…”. Most sentences remain understandable, so grammatical errors rarely obstruct the message. Some errors in agreement, articles, and verb forms are present: “the local people is” should use a plural verb, “an English tourist visit” needs a singular verb, and “almost everyone understand and speak” also requires singular agreement. There are also awkward sentence constructions, such as “It is not uncommon fact,” and the final sentence of the second body paragraph would benefit from a clearer grammatical structure. Review subject–verb agreement and article use, then proofread each sentence for a complete, natural construction.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.