Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-23
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Living in a nation where we have to talk a foreign language can cause very challenging social problems, and same as practical problems.I completely agree with the above notion and in the forthcomping paragraphs I have supported my stand with reasonable justification.
First of all taking into the agreement side, first and foremost reason is that to living in a country, there people have to speak foreign language can makes social problems in the language barrier.And they can cannot speak foreign language because they use their native language in their daily life and they cannot have practice of learning the different foreign languages.
Furthermore, the another reason is that they have to face social problems like communicating with each other for their work related issues.They cannot make friends easily because they cannot speak very well. For instance, My friend who had faced problem in communication, that is she go for buying clothes and the big problem of communicattion is that the owner can only speak in english language while she doesn't speak and understand anyother languages except Gujarati.So she had faced that problem through the technology use by translating slowly to the owner's script.
In addition, living in a nation where people have to speak foreign language can also cause a challenging problem in practical.Prcatical problems in the several factors such as in education, hospital and for ordering some food from online websites like as zomato, blinkit and swiggy. Through this people can face for learning new things at school and colleges.Apart from that, In hospitals, patient cannot get proper treatment but they can use translator for translating.For example, if people want to order some food and they known to the different languages then they can get easily delivery of food at home and also by the usage of translator.
To Conclude, I believe that, there are several benefits of speaking foreign language but it can be a serious and challenging social as well as practical problem because of the language barrier and communication problem but it can be resolved through the usage of technology like as translator.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by discussing both social and practical problems associated with living in a foreign-language environment, presenting a clear position of agreement. The introduction outlines the stance, and body paragraphs present relevant ideas concerning social barriers and practical hurdles such as education, healthcare, and daily services. However, the development of these ideas is limited and somewhat repetitive, featuring over-generalised examples like buying clothes or ordering food through apps. While all parts of the task are addressed, the depth of exploration corresponds to a Band 6, as the arguments are not fully extended or substantiated with sophisticated reasoning.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The essay is arranged into a standard five-paragraph structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, providing an overall coherent arrangement. However, referencing and cohesive devices are frequently faulty or mechanical, as seen in phrases like 'taking into the agreement side' and 'furthermore, the another reason'. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion lacks smooth progression due to abrupt shifts and repetitive sentence openings. Furthermore, some sentences lack clear logical links, causing the reader to pause. These limitations place the performance firmly at Band 5.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully communicating everyday concepts with terms such as 'language barrier', 'communication', and 'translation'. However, there are numerous word-choice and collocation errors, such as 'talk a foreign language' instead of 'speak a foreign language', 'practical problems in the several factors', and 'known to the different languages'. Less common vocabulary is attempted but often used inaccurately, and spelling errors like 'forthcomping' occur. Despite these slips, meaning is generally conveyed, matching the Band 5 descriptors.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but control is inconsistent. There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including missing prepositions, incorrect subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'there people have to speak', 'patient cannot get proper treatment'), and tangled clause structures (e.g., 'My friend who had faced problem in communication, that is she go for buying clothes'). While the sentences are generally understandable and communication is rarely completely impeded, the high frequency of errors across basic structures limits the score to Band 5.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.