Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-02
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
In the modern era, most of individuals have a good communication skills and few people think it can cause serious social problems, as well as practial problems. I disagree with this statement, I expalin in upcoming paragraphs along with suitable examples and mine opinion too.
One of the primary reasons is that why foreign language is crucial for everyone because they can easily understand the other's perspective as well as easily communicate with each other. To elaborate it, there are several people in one place and they wants to communicate but they have only there native langaue so, they need one language where they can easily communicate. A good example of that, There are many historical places, where thousands of people want to see them but they have there own native language so, it will create an issuses for them. Few memebers those who are educated they can take a help of translater, consequently it will easily provide a good solution for them.
Another positive development is that, Although individuals have their own laguage, in recent years english plays a vital role in everyone's lives. Also, Most of best companies nowadays want a good communication skilsl because they can easily exaplin their point of views. A pertinent illustration is that, Google is one of the top ranked comapny and they hired a employees form everywhere, so they want good communication skills. Another instances is that, If people have a good skills, they can easily work an international companies, which will expand their business in an inernational levels.
To conculde, I believe that foreign language is create a stong bond them and people can easily expand their busniness in an international levels. Communcation is necessary for everyone.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response addresses the prompt partially, outlining a disagreement with the statement that living in a foreign-language country causes serious problems. However, the position is not always clearly sustained, and ideas are limited and under-developed. For instance, the discussion on historical places and translation tools lacks logical depth and fails to directly answer how foreign languages impact social and practical life. Similarly, the points regarding multinational companies like Google touch on communication skills generally rather than focusing clearly on the specific challenges of operating in a foreign language environment. To reach a higher level, the writer needs to present fully developed ideas with more relevant, well-supported arguments that directly tackle all parts of the prompt.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
There is some basic organisation with clear paragraph breaks, but the response lacks a clear overall progression. While paragraphing is attempted, the logical flow between sentences is frequently disrupted by mechanical and inaccurate cohesive devices. Phrases like 'To elaborate it' and 'Another positive development is that' are used formulaically rather than to genuinely connect ideas. Additionally, referencing is sometimes unclear, such as when pronouns like 'they' and 'there' are confused or lack precise antecedents, making the relationships between sentences difficult to follow. To improve cohesion, the writer should use a wider variety of cohesive devices more accurately and ensure that each paragraph moves smoothly and logically to the next point without repetitive phrasing.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is limited and barely adequate for the task, containing noticeable errors that frequently cause difficulty for the reader. There are numerous word choice, word form, and spelling errors throughout the text, such as 'practial' instead of practical, 'languae' instead of language, 'comapny' instead of company, and 'exaplin' instead of explain. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary items like 'pertinent illustration' and 'international levels', but these are often marred by collocation or grammatical form errors, such as 'work an international companies'. To progress, the writer must expand their vocabulary range, pay closer attention to word spelling and word forms, and use terms with greater precision and natural collocation.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response demonstrates a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on basic sentence forms alongside faulty attempts at complex sentences. There are frequent grammatical errors in almost every sentence, including tense inconsistencies, missing or incorrect articles, subject-verb agreement issues, and preposition errors, such as 'in an inernational levels'. For example, clauses are awkwardly joined, as seen in 'I disagree with this statement, I expalin in upcoming paragraphs'. Punctuation is also problematic in places. These frequent errors cause considerable difficulty for the reader and obscure meaning. To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to use a greater variety of complex structures with improved accuracy, ensuring that basic grammar rules and sentence boundaries are properly controlled.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.