Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given bar chart compares the percentage of distinct housewares in personal and rented properities for living in both England and Wales between the year 1918 an 2001.

Overall, households in rented houses decreased gradually over the period of given time till year 2001. While housewares in personal properities showed a continuous boost till the year 2001.

From year 1918 to 1971, households in the rented accomodations has far more greater percentage than housewares in the personal accomodations although it decreased at steady rate. While the percentage remained same slightly below than 70% from year 1939 to 1953. On the other hand, percentage of holdholds in the personal homes showed smoother progression and eventually approached at 50% in the year 1971. In this year the percentgae for both the aspects remained same at the 50%. After this year a prograssive decline in the households in rented accomodations was observed till year 2001. Alternatively, the percentage of the housewares in personal homes started surging and reached just below 70% in the year 2001. But in the 2011 the households in the personal home experienced a slight decrease and reached just below the 65%, but on the other hand the housewares in the rented accomodations experienced a slight increase from just above the 30% to just above the 35%..

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response successfully covers all main features and trends in the chart, noting the overall shift from rented to owned accommodation and correctly highlighting the crossover point in 1971. The data is reported accurately for the most part, although the introduction incorrectly states the timeline ends in 2001 instead of 2011. While the key features are addressed, some details are slightly repetitive or under-developed, particularly regarding the plateau between 1939 and 1953. To reach a higher level, the response would need to ensure every year mentioned aligns perfectly with the prompt data and provide a more fully extended analysis of the wider trends without minor inaccuracies.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear attempt to structure the information chronologically. Paragraphing is utilised to separate the introduction, overall summary, and body details, which helps guide the reader. However, the progression between ideas is sometimes mechanical or slightly disjointed due to repetitive use of cohesive devices like 'while' and 'on the other hand'. Referencing is occasionally unclear, and the flow of sentences within paragraphs could be smoother to achieve a more natural logical progression. Greater variety and precision in cohesive links are required to elevate this criterion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, but it contains frequent inaccuracies in word choice, collocation, and form. For example, the student repeatedly uses non-standard terms such as 'housewares' instead of 'households', and 'personal properities' instead of 'owned accommodation'. There are also awkward lexical combinations like 'smoother progression' and 'progressive decline'. While the meaning is generally communicated despite these errors, the lack of precision and the presence of noticeable word-choice flaws limit the score to this band. A wider and more accurate deployment of topic-specific lexis is necessary for higher bands.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The writer demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, attempting comparative structures and time clauses. However, there are persistent grammatical and punctuation errors throughout the text. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues, such as 'households in the rented accomodations has', and awkward prepositional phrases like 'for living in both England and Wales'. Punctuation is also faulty in places, notably the double period at the end of the final sentence. Although these errors rarely impede overall communication, their frequency prevents the response from achieving a higher rating, which requires a greater proportion of error-free sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.