Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

This bar chat illustrates the comparison between the percentage of households in rented and owned accomodations within the span of 1918 to 2011.

Overall, the bar chart depicts that the households in the rented accomodations steadily decreaded. Whereas, the households in the owned accomodations increased year by year.

To begin with, the households in the rented accomodations has toped in 1918 with 77% of the population and in 2001 it dropped to its least with 31% of the numbers.Thoroughly, it has decreased in England and Wales within the time span of 90 years.

Conversely, the households in the owned accomodations was at its lowest point with 22% of the population and it surged respectively within the year and was at its highest point at 69% in numbers.

The households in rented accomodations in 2011 is 37% roughly however the households in owned accomodations is 63% approximately in England and Wales.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the two opposing trends and provide an overview: renting generally declined while ownership rose. Several figures are accurate, including rented accommodation at 77% in 1918 and 31% in 2001, and the approximate 2011 split. However, the overview says the trends continued steadily, overlooking the plateau in both series from 1939 to 1953 and the reversal between 2001 and 2011. The ownership figure at its lowest is also given as 22%, slightly below the chart’s approximate 23%. Your account would be more complete if it highlighted the crossover at 50% in 1971 and the modest late decline in ownership, rather than describing the rise as continuing to a high point without covering the intervening pattern.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the two accommodation types, followed by the 2011 comparison. Linking expressions such as “Overall” and “Conversely” help signal the main contrast, and the reader can follow the broad direction of change. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some effective progression. However, connections between details are sometimes mechanical or unclear. “Whereas” begins a sentence fragment, while “Thoroughly” does not clearly explain how the preceding figures relate to the overall trend. The final comparison could be integrated into the ownership and renting discussion, and the paragraphs would progress more logically if they compared key stages and the 1971 crossover.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for describing the chart, including “percentage,” “surged,” “lowest point,” and “highest point,” so the main information is generally understandable. However, the range and precision are limited by repeated use of “households in the rented/owned accommodations” and imprecise expressions such as “toped,” “in numbers,” and “decreased … within the time span.” There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “chat,” “accomodations,” and “decreaded.” Some choices do not fit the data well: “population” is not the unit shown, and “steadily” oversimplifies the changes. Aim for accurate chart language such as “proportion of households,” “peaked,” and “fell,” and check spelling and collocations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mixture of simple and more complex forms, including a contrast with “Whereas” and a sentence beginning “Conversely.” The overall meaning remains understandable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity and control. For example, “the households … has toped” has a subject–verb agreement error, and “the households … was at its lowest” also uses a singular verb with a plural subject. “Whereas, the households … increased” is an incomplete dependent clause, and “in 2001 it dropped” needs clearer punctuation between the clauses. The final sentence shifts awkwardly between present and past reporting. Practise complete contrast sentences, consistent past-tense reporting, and agreement between plural subjects and verbs.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.