Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-08-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

This chart illustrates the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in the year 2014 . The country that was ranked number 1 for the production and consumption of electricity is China . China generated 5.398 billion kWh electricity and consumed 5.322 billion kWh . And the country number 2 on the list was United states who manufactured 4.099 billion kWh electricity while the demand was only 3.866 billion kWh . And Russia was number 3 on the list, it created 1.057 billion kWh electricity and used 1.038 billion kWh . An Japan was number 4 on the list who developed 936.2 billion kWh while the usage is only 856.7 . India was number 5 on the list who constructed 871 billion kWh and utilized only 698.8 kWh . Canada was number 6 on the list who make 618.9 billion kWh while utilized only 499.9 billion kWh . And France was number 7 on the list who formed 561.2 billion kWh and harnessed only 462.9 kWh . Brazil was number 8 on the list who developed 530.7 billion kWh while exploited only 455.8 billion kWh . While Germany case was little different because it constructed only 526.6 billion kWh while used 582.5 kWh . And Korean Republic produced 485.1 and used only 449.1 billion kWh .

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response covers all ten countries listed in the chart, which is a strength. However, the approach is overly mechanical, listing each country one by one in a repetitive 'number X' format. This prevents the identification of clear trends or meaningful comparisons. For example, the response fails to group countries by region or highlight the significant gap between China/USA and the rest of the list. To reach a higher band, you must synthesize the data by identifying main features and trends rather than simply transcribing the figures for each country in order.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The response lacks paragraphing, which makes it difficult to read. The progression of ideas is purely linear, following the order of the chart rather than grouping information logically. Cohesive devices are repetitive and basic; the frequent use of 'And' at the start of sentences and the repetitive structure 'number X on the list' make the flow mechanical. There is a lack of variety in linking words, and the absence of a clear overview or distinct paragraphs hinders the overall coherence of the report.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is quite limited and repetitive. You frequently use the same verbs, such as 'constructed', 'developed', and 'manufactured', which are often contextually inappropriate for electricity production. For instance, 'constructed' is not the correct term for generating power. There is also a lack of variety in reporting verbs and nouns related to data comparison. While the figures are communicated clearly, the range of vocabulary is insufficient to demonstrate the flexibility required for higher bands. Using more precise terminology like 'generated', 'output', or 'surpassed' would improve the quality.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response relies on a very repetitive sentence structure, primarily using 'The country that was...' or 'X was number Y'. There is a lack of complex sentence structures. Several grammatical errors are present, such as 'United states' (needs an article), 'An Japan' (incorrect article), and 'Germany case was little different' (missing possessive and article). Additionally, there are inconsistencies in verb tenses and number agreement. While the meaning is generally clear, the lack of structural variety and the presence of frequent minor errors limit the score in this criterion.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.