Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-07-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The table graph compare the number of households in America in millions with their yearly income in 2007,2011 and 2015.

Overall, with the time house numbers with more than 1 million annual income was keep increasing through out all the years however, the households number with 50 K and 75 K annual income was steadily in all years.

Looking first in the year 2007 the number of US households with 25,000 and less than 49,000 annual salary was 25 millions and approximately 28 millions respectively. However, the annual salary number of households reached almost 30 millions after 4 years. In 2015, the number faced slight decreased and stopped at 29 millions households number.

On the other hand, American households numbers with 50,000 and 75,000 yearly income were almost same through out all 9 years with 20 millions and 15 millions respectively. Turning to people with 1 million or more than that annual income keep growing and reached it's peak in 2015 with almost 32 millions number of households in United States.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the task requirements by summarizing the main features of the chart. You have identified key trends, such as the growth in the highest income bracket and the relative stability of the middle-income groups. However, there are significant inaccuracies in your data reporting. For example, you state that the number of households with 1 million or more income reached 32 million in 2015, which is a misinterpretation of the data provided. Additionally, the description of the 25k-49k category is somewhat confusing. To improve, ensure that your data points are accurately transcribed from the chart and that your comparisons are precise.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, with an introduction, an overview, and body paragraphs. You use some cohesive devices like 'Overall', 'Looking first', and 'On the other hand' to guide the reader. However, the flow is occasionally hindered by awkward phrasing and mechanical transitions. For instance, the transition 'with the time house numbers' is unnatural. To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensure that your referencing (e.g., 'the number') clearly points back to the specific data being discussed, rather than using vague descriptors.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

Your vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but it lacks the precision required for a higher band. You rely on repetitive phrasing such as 'number of households' and 'annual income'. There are also some errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'the table graph compare' (should be 'compares') and 'stopped at 29 millions households number'. To improve, try to incorporate more varied synonyms for 'increase' and 'decrease' and avoid redundant phrasing. Using more precise terminology for data trends will help demonstrate a better range of vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('households numbers... were'), incorrect verb tenses ('was keep increasing'), and punctuation errors. For example, 'reached it's peak' contains an unnecessary apostrophe. While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of these errors prevents the writing from reaching a higher band. Focus on proofreading for basic subject-verb agreement and ensuring that your verb forms are consistent throughout the report.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.